Lexplug logoLexplug

Irwin v. Gavit

Supreme Court of the United States
1925 U.S. LEXIS 557, 268 U.S. 161, 45 S. Ct. 475 (1925)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

Periodic payments made to a beneficiary from the income of a testamentary trust are considered taxable income to the beneficiary, not a tax-exempt bequest of property.


Facts:

  • Anthony N. Brady died, and his will was admitted to probate on August 12, 1913.
  • The will established a trust with the residue of his estate.
  • The trust directed trustees to apply a portion of the income generated by one-sixth of the trust to the education and support of his granddaughter, Marcia Ann Gavit.
  • The will stipulated that the remaining balance of that income was to be divided, with one half paid to the testator's son-in-law, E. Palmer Gavit, in quarterly payments.
  • Gavit's right to receive payments was set to terminate when his daughter, who was six years old at the time, reached the age of twenty-one or died.
  • Gavit did not have any interest in the principal (corpus) of the trust fund itself.
  • Gavit received these payments derived from the trust's income in 1913, 1914, and 1915.

Procedural Posture:

  • E. Palmer Gavit (plaintiff) sued the Collector of Internal Revenue in U.S. District Court to recover income taxes and penalties he had paid.
  • The Collector (defendant) demurred to the complaint.
  • The District Court, a trial court, overruled the demurrer and entered judgment for Gavit.
  • The Collector appealed the judgment to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, an intermediate appellate court.
  • The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of Gavit.
  • The Collector petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court, the highest court, for a writ of certiorari, which was granted.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Are periodic payments made to a beneficiary from the income generated by a trust fund, as stipulated by a will, considered taxable 'income' under the Income Tax Act of 1913, or are they an exempt 'bequest' of property?


Opinions:

Majority - Mr. Justice Holmes

Yes, the payments are considered taxable income. The provision of the Income Tax Act of 1913 exempting bequests applies to the gift of a corpus and contrasts it with the income arising from that corpus; it was not intended to exempt payments that are properly defined as income simply because they originate from a will. The statute's intent was to tax income from all sources. The money was income in the hands of the trustees and did not lose its character as income when paid to the beneficiary, Gavit. The court perceives no relevant distinction between a gift of a fund for life and a gift of the income from it; in both cases, the fund is appropriated to produce an income stream. These quarterly payments from the income of a large fund must be regarded as income within the meaning of the Constitution and the tax law.


Dissenting - Mr. Justice Sutherland

No, the payments are an exempt bequest. The statute's plain terms exclude the value of property acquired by bequest from net income. The money Gavit received was paid to him under the express provisions of a will, making it a bequest by definition. Under well-settled principles of statutory construction for tax laws, the inquiry should go no further, as taxing statutes must be construed strictly and adhere to the very words used. The money Gavit received was not the 'fruits of a legacy'; it was the legacy itself, and the corpus of the estate was merely the source from which this bequest arose.



Analysis:

This decision established a fundamental principle of income taxation for trusts and estates by drawing a clear distinction between a gift of corpus and a gift of income. It prevents beneficiaries from receiving income streams tax-free under the guise of an exempt 'bequest.' The ruling solidifies the 'conduit' theory of trust taxation, where income generated by a trust retains its character as income when distributed to a beneficiary. This precedent has had a lasting impact, ensuring that the broad congressional power to tax income 'from whatever source derived' is not easily circumvented by estate planning techniques involving trusts.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Irwin v. Gavit (1925) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Irwin v. Gavit