Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Winkle
2007 WL 778178, 863 N.E.2d 1, 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 478 (2007)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Indiana's Medical Malpractice Act, claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress arising from the death of an unborn child are derivative claims. Because an unborn child is not a "patient" under the Act, such derivative claims cannot form the basis for a separate statutory damages award and must be included within the mother's single recovery cap for her own physical injuries.
Facts:
- In 1998, Lori Winkle, while pregnant with her and her husband Darrin Winkle's first child, developed hyperemesis gravidarum, a severe form of pregnancy-related nausea.
- During her treatment, Lori's health care providers failed to give her vitamin supplements.
- This malpractice led to malnutrition and a vitamin deficiency, causing Lori to suffer from Wernicke's encephalopathy, a permanent degenerative brain disorder.
- As a result of the same malpractice, Lori and Darrin lost their unborn child at seventeen weeks gestation.
- Lori incurred over $330,000 in medical and related expenses due to her neurological injury.
Procedural Posture:
- Lori and Darrin Winkle initiated a medical malpractice proceeding against their health care providers.
- The Winkles settled with the health care providers for the statutory maximum of $100,000.
- The Winkles then filed a petition in the trial court against the Indiana Patient’s Compensation Fund ('the Fund') to recover excess damages.
- The trial court found that the Winkles were entitled to three separate maximum statutory damage awards for Lori's physical injury, Lori's emotional distress, and Darrin's emotional distress, ordering the Fund to pay $2,150,000.
- The Fund, as the appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Court of Appeals of Indiana; the Winkles were the appellees.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does Indiana's Medical Malpractice Act permit separate statutory damage awards for parents' emotional distress claims arising from the death of their unborn child, in addition to the award for the mother's direct physical injuries from the same act of malpractice?
Opinions:
Majority - Robb, Judge
No, Indiana's Medical Malpractice Act does not permit separate statutory damage awards for the parents' emotional distress arising from the death of an unborn child. The Act limits total recovery for 'an injury or death of a patient.' While claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress are recognized, under the Act they are considered 'derivative claims.' A derivative claim requires an underlying injury to a 'patient.' The court, interpreting prior case law (Bolin v. Winger), holds that the statutory term 'patient,' defined as an 'individual,' refers only to a living person. Therefore, an unborn child is not a 'patient' under the Act. Without an underlying 'patient' from whom the emotional distress claims can derive, Lori and Darrin Winkle are not entitled to separate recovery caps for these claims. Any damages for the emotional trauma of losing the child must be recovered under the single statutory cap allotted to Lori for her own physical injuries as the actual victim of the malpractice.
Analysis:
This decision significantly clarifies and limits the scope of recovery available under the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act in cases involving fetal death. By defining 'patient' to exclude an unborn child, the court prevents the stacking of statutory damage caps for parents' emotional distress, thereby protecting the Patient's Compensation Fund from expanded liability. The ruling solidifies the principle that derivative claims, even for recognized torts like negligent infliction of emotional distress, have no independent basis for recovery under the Act without a qualifying underlying 'patient.' This creates a clear, though harsh, precedent that channels all damages related to a miscarriage caused by malpractice into the mother's single recovery cap.
