In Re Thomas C.
44 Conn. Super. Ct. 437, 691 A.2d 1140, 44 Conn. Supp. 437 (1996)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A petition for emancipation will be denied, despite a minor's persistent misbehavior, if the parents fail to show 'good cause' and that emancipation is in the best interest of the parties, particularly when the minor is dependent, immature, and lacks the ability to be self-sufficient.
Facts:
- Thomas C., a sixteen-year-old, lived at home with his parents, Jeffrey and Maureen C., and his three younger brothers.
- Thomas had a learning disability (attention deficit disorder), had dropped out of high school, was unemployed, and refused to look for work.
- He was verbally abusive toward his parents and both physically and verbally abusive to his younger brothers, creating significant tension in the home.
- Thomas was previously arrested for breach of the peace following a domestic dispute with his father.
- For a six-month period, Thomas lived with his maternal uncle and grandmother, where his behavior was good, but he left and eventually returned to his parents' home.
- Thomas was completely dependent on his parents for food, shelter, and all other necessities.
- Jeffrey C. stated he did not intend to immediately remove Thomas from the home but wanted to use the emancipation decree as a 'lever' to compel better behavior.
Procedural Posture:
- Jeffrey and Maureen C. (petitioners) filed a petition for the emancipation of their minor son, Thomas C., in the Superior Court for Juvenile Matters at Plainville (trial court).
- The case was transferred to a different venue within the Superior Court for a contested hearing.
- The court appointed a guardian ad litem to represent the interests of Thomas C.
- The court, on its own motion, ordered a court services officer to investigate the allegations and file a report with the court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a sixteen-year-old minor's verbal and physical abuse, defiance of authority, and refusal to work or attend school constitute 'good cause' for a court to grant a petition for emancipation when the minor is wholly dependent on his parents for support and lacks the emotional and financial stability to live independently?
Opinions:
Majority - Dyer, J.
No. A minor's misbehavior does not constitute 'good cause' for emancipation under the statute when the minor is wholly dependent on his parents and lacks the capacity for self-sufficiency, as granting the petition would be detrimental to the minor's best interests. The court found that emancipation would be extremely harmful to Thomas, who is dependent, immature, and lacks the educational and financial ability to live on his own. The parents acknowledged this by admitting they did not intend to make him leave, proving there was no realistic plan for his future, which the court described as 'courting a head-on collision with disaster.' Furthermore, conferring adult rights, such as the ability to contract or own property, upon an impulsive and troubled teenager would be improvident. The court reasoned that parental obligations are fundamental and cannot be 'lightly shed' simply due to a child's difficult behavior; a 'substantial reason' is required, which was not met here.
Analysis:
This case clarifies the 'good cause' and 'best interest' standards within Connecticut's emancipation statute, establishing that emancipation is not a remedy for parental frustration with a difficult but dependent teenager. The decision prioritizes the minor's welfare and capacity for independence over the parents' desire to be relieved of their legal and emotional burdens. This precedent signals to lower courts that they must conduct a thorough inquiry into a minor's actual ability to function as an adult before terminating parental obligations, regardless of the minor's misconduct.
Unlock the full brief for In Re Thomas C.