In Re the Marriage of Wessels
542 N.W.2d 486, 1995 WL 699856 (1995)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A court can modify a limited-duration rehabilitative alimony award and convert it into permanent alimony if the recipient spouse experiences a substantial, permanent, and unforeseen change in circumstances that makes the original goal of self-sufficiency impossible and renders the original decree grossly unfair.
Facts:
- James Wessels and Yvonne Wessels married in 1966 while he was in medical school.
- Yvonne worked as a nurse to support the couple until the birth of their first child in 1970, after which she became a full-time homemaker.
- The parties divorced in 1986, and their stipulated decree provided Yvonne with rehabilitative alimony of $3,100 per month for sixty months, with the goal of her becoming self-sufficient.
- At the time of the dissolution, Yvonne had already begun experiencing psychiatric problems, including major depression and chronic post-traumatic stress disorder.
- Following the divorce, Yvonne's mental and physical health severely deteriorated, leading to numerous hospitalizations and making her unable to complete further education or maintain employment.
- A treating psychiatrist opined that Yvonne is permanently disabled and will never be able to work again.
- During the same period, James's career as an anesthesiologist flourished, with his annual income exceeding $300,000.
Procedural Posture:
- Yvonne Wessels filed a petition in the district court to modify the dissolution decree, seeking to continue her rehabilitative alimony or convert it to permanent alimony.
- The district court found a significant change in circumstances and modified the decree, ordering James Wessels to pay permanent alimony of $3,100 per month.
- The district court also ordered the alimony payments to be placed into a court-supervised trust for Yvonne's benefit.
- James Wessels (appellant) appealed the district court's judgment modifying the alimony.
- Yvonne Wessels (appellee and cross-appellant) cross-appealed the portion of the judgment requiring the alimony to be paid into a trust.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Can a court modify a decree to convert limited-duration rehabilitative alimony into permanent alimony when the recipient spouse suffers a severe and permanent deterioration in health that was not contemplated at the time of the original decree and prevents her from ever becoming self-supporting?
Opinions:
Majority - Harris, J.
Yes. A court has the authority to convert rehabilitative alimony to permanent alimony when subsequent events are so extreme in nature that they render the initial decree grossly unfair. Citing precedent like In re Marriage of Marshall, the court has the power to modify a decree in rare and extraordinary circumstances. Here, Yvonne’s permanent and severe health deterioration was a substantial change in circumstances not contemplated at the time of the original decree. This unforeseen change made the goal of self-sufficiency impossible, justifying the conversion of her rehabilitative alimony to permanent alimony to prevent an inequitable result.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies that while rehabilitative alimony is intended to be temporary, it is not immutable in the face of extraordinary and unforeseen circumstances. It establishes that a severe, permanent decline in a spouse's health that thwarts the goal of self-sufficiency can justify converting a temporary award into a permanent one. This reinforces the court's equitable power to modify decrees to prevent gross unfairness, setting a high but achievable standard for such modifications. The ruling also affirms a key limit on judicial power by holding that courts cannot impose a trust on alimony payments without explicit statutory authority, highlighting the principle that domestic relations remedies are largely creatures of statute.
