In re the Accounting of Schneider
198 Misc. 1017, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2126, 100 N.Y.S.2d 371 (1950)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When determining title to real property located in a foreign jurisdiction, a court must apply the 'whole law' of the situs, which includes the foreign jurisdiction's conflict of laws rules.
Facts:
- The decedent, a naturalized U.S. citizen of Swiss origin who retained dual citizenship, died while domiciled in New York.
- His estate included real property located in Switzerland.
- The decedent's will purported to dispose of the Swiss property in a manner that violated Swiss internal law.
- Swiss internal law grants heirs a non-divestable right to a portion of a decedent's property, known as a 'legitime'.
- After the decedent's death, the administratrix of his estate sold the Swiss real property.
- The proceeds from the sale of the Swiss property were transmitted to New York for administration.
Procedural Posture:
- An administratrix was appointed to manage the decedent's estate in the Surrogate's Court of New York County.
- The administratrix liquidated the decedent's Swiss real property and transmitted the proceeds to New York.
- The administratrix submitted an accounting to the Surrogate's Court.
- Claimants to the estate filed objections to the accounting, specifically challenging the validity of the will's disposition of the Swiss property under Swiss law.
- The Surrogate's Court is now adjudicating the objections to determine how the proceeds from the Swiss property should be distributed.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the 'law of the situs,' when used by a New York court to determine the validity of a testamentary disposition of foreign land, refer to the whole law of the situs, including its conflict of laws rules?
Opinions:
Majority - Surrogate Frankenthaler
Yes. The 'law of the situs' refers to the whole law of that country, including its conflict of laws rules, to ensure that the determination of title is the same as it would be if the question were adjudicated in the country where the land is located. The primary reason for applying the law of the situs is that the law-enforcing agencies of the country where the land is situated have exclusive control over it. Therefore, a New York court, when obligated to adjudicate title to that land (or a fund substituted for it), should be guided by the same methods a court in the situs country would employ. In this case, expert testimony established that Swiss conflict of laws rules would direct a Swiss court to apply the law of the decedent's domicile—New York. By applying the whole law of Switzerland (including this choice-of-law rule), the court is referred back to New York's internal law. Under New York law, the testamentary disposition is valid. This application of 'renvoi' avoids a 'perpetually-enclosed circle' because the foreign conflict rule refers to the internal law of the domicile, not its whole law.
Analysis:
This case is significant for its explicit adoption of the doctrine of renvoi in the context of disputes over title to foreign real property. By defining 'law of the situs' to mean the entire law of the foreign jurisdiction, including its conflict of laws rules, the court ensures uniformity of result regardless of the forum. This decision provides a clear precedent in New York for looking beyond the internal substantive law of a foreign state, requiring courts to effectively place themselves in the position of the foreign court. It solidifies an exception to the general American judicial resistance to renvoi, aligning New York law with the Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws § 8 and prominent English authorities on this specific issue.
