Lexplug logoLexplug

In re Neher’s Will

New York Court of Appeals
Unknown (1939)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

When a charitable bequest's specific direction becomes impracticable, the doctrine of cy pres may be applied to modify the gift's use if the testator's paramount intention was for a general charitable purpose rather than for a particular, limited one.


Facts:

  • Ella Neher's will devised her home to the incorporated Village of Red Hook.
  • The will stated the gift was a memorial to her husband, Herbert Neher.
  • The will included a direction that the property be used as a hospital, to be known as the 'Herbert Neher Memorial Hospital.'
  • The will designated the Village of Red Hook's elected trustees as the hospital's managing board.
  • The Village of Red Hook formally accepted the property under the terms of the will.
  • Years later, the Village determined it lacked the financial resources to establish and maintain a hospital on the property.
  • A modern hospital established in the neighboring village of Rhinebeck was adequately serving the medical needs of the Red Hook community.

Procedural Posture:

  • The Village of Red Hook petitioned the Surrogate’s Court of Dutchess County, the court of first instance, to construe the will of Ella Neher.
  • The Surrogate’s Court denied the petition, holding that the will expressed a specific charitable intent limited to operating a hospital.
  • The Village of Red Hook, as appellant, appealed the decree to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, an intermediate appellate court.
  • The Appellate Division affirmed the Surrogate's Court's decree.
  • The New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, granted the Village of Red Hook leave to appeal.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a testator's direction to use a devised property as a hospital prevent the application of the cy pres doctrine when that use becomes impracticable, if the gift was made to a municipality for the benefit of the entire community?


Opinions:

Majority - Loughran, J.

No. A testator's direction to use a devised property for a specific purpose does not prevent the application of the cy pres doctrine where the paramount intention of the gift is a general charitable one. The court reasoned that the gift was primarily to a whole community—'to the incorporated Village of Red Hook'—indicating a general charitable intent to benefit the public. The direction to create a hospital was viewed as a secondary, 'grafted' suggestion on how to carry out this general beneficence, not as the essential substance of the gift. The lack of specific details regarding the hospital's management or type of care further supported the conclusion that the primary intent was general. Because the specific direction was impracticable, the court could apply cy pres to frame a new scheme that carries out the testator's general charitable purpose.



Analysis:

This decision clarifies the application of the cy pres doctrine by emphasizing the distinction between a general and a particular charitable intent. It establishes that a gift to a municipality is strong evidence of a general intent to benefit the community, making it easier for courts to save such gifts from failure. The ruling gives courts greater flexibility to modify the terms of a charitable trust when the original purpose becomes impossible or impracticable, thereby prioritizing the donor's overall benevolent intent over a rigid adherence to a specific, unworkable plan. This precedent encourages a more practical approach to charitable bequests, ensuring they continue to serve the public good in altered circumstances.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query In re Neher’s Will (1939) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for In re Neher’s Will