In re Kimmel’s Estate
438-442 (1924)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An informal document, such as a letter, will be considered a valid will if it demonstrates clear testamentary intent to make a posthumous gift. A signature is valid if the testator intended the mark, whatever its form, to be their final, authenticating signature.
Facts:
- A decedent wrote a letter to his two sons, George and Irvin, discussing family matters, pork preservation, and the weather.
- Within the letter, the decedent wrote, 'I have some very valuable papers I want you to keep fore me so if enny thing hapens all the scock money in the 3 Bank liberty Iones Post office stamps and my home on Horner St goes to George Dari & Irvin'.
- The decedent instructed his sons to 'Kepp this letter lock it up it may help you out.'
- He concluded and signed the letter with the word 'Father.'
- The decedent mailed the letter on the morning of December 12, 1921.
- The decedent died suddenly on the afternoon of December 12, 1921, the same day he wrote and mailed the letter.
Procedural Posture:
- A letter written by the decedent, Harry A. Kimmel, was offered for probate as his will.
- The orphans' court (the court of first instance for estate matters) entered a decree directing the register of wills to probate the letter.
- One of the decedent's heirs at law, the appellant, appealed the decree of the orphans' court to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an informal, handwritten letter that disposes of property upon the contingency 'if enny thing hapens' and is signed 'Father' constitute a valid testamentary will under the Pennsylvania Wills Act?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Justice Simpson
Yes. An informal letter can serve as a valid will if it sufficiently indicates testamentary intent, and an informal closing like 'Father' can be a valid signature if intended as such. The court found that the decedent's language demonstrated a clear purpose to make a posthumous gift. The phrase 'if enny thing hapens' is a classic expression of testamentary intent, conditioning the gift on the event of his death. His death later that day satisfied the contingency. The court also reasoned that the instruction to 'lock it up' because it 'may help you out' further confirmed his intent for the letter to have legal significance. Regarding the signature, the court held that the Wills Act is concerned with the finality and placement of a signature, not its specific form. Citing precedent, the court affirmed that what matters is whether the testator 'meant' the mark as a signature. Since the decedent signed all such letters with 'Father' and mailed this one as a completed document, his intent to execute the instrument was apparent.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the legal principle that courts should prioritize the testator's intent over strict formalities, particularly regarding holographic wills. By recognizing 'if enny thing hapens' as a clear expression of testamentary intent and accepting 'Father' as a valid signature, the court expanded the scope of what can constitute a will. This ruling provides flexibility for laypersons who create their own estate plans without legal counsel, but it also potentially increases litigation by inviting courts to interpret the intent behind informal communications and signatures.
Unlock the full brief for In re Kimmel’s Estate