In Re Estate of Antonopoulos
1999 Kan. LEXIS 658, 268 Kan. 178, 993 P.2d 637 (1999)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A decedent's fractional interest in property held in joint tenancy with a right of survivorship with a person other than the surviving spouse is included in the augmented estate for the purpose of calculating the surviving spouse's elective share.
Facts:
- In 1983 and 1985, John N. Antonopoulos, Sr. (Nick) and his son from a prior marriage, John N. Antonopoulos, Jr. (John), acquired three parcels of real estate together, titling them in joint tenancy with right of survivorship.
- Nick began living with Barbara J. Antonopoulos (Barbara) in 1987.
- Nick and Barbara were formally married in a ceremony in July 1992.
- Prior to his death, Nick had filed for divorce from Barbara.
- Nick died intestate (without a will) on October 4, 1997, survived by Barbara and his adult children, including John.
Procedural Posture:
- After John N. Antonopoulos, Sr. died intestate, his surviving spouse, Barbara J. Antonopoulos, was appointed administratrix of his estate.
- Barbara filed a petition in the district court to take an elective share of the estate.
- A dispute arose between Barbara and the decedent's son, John N. Antonopoulos, Jr., over the length of the marriage and the composition of the augmented estate.
- The district court judge found that a common-law marriage existed, which increased Barbara's elective share to 30 percent.
- The same court also found that property the decedent held in joint tenancy with his son was not part of the augmented estate and thus was not subject to Barbara's elective share.
- Barbara appealed the district court's ruling on the joint tenancy property to the state's highest court.
- John cross-appealed the ruling on the common-law marriage.
- The case was transferred to the Supreme Court of Kansas for review.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a decedent's fractional interest in real property held in joint tenancy with a third party, which passes to that party by right of survivorship upon the decedent's death, constitute part of the augmented estate from which a surviving spouse can take an elective share under Kansas law?
Opinions:
Majority - Lockett, J.
Yes, a decedent's fractional interest in property held in joint tenancy with a third party is included in the augmented estate for calculating a surviving spouse's elective share. The Kansas elective-share statute, K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 59-6a205, explicitly defines the 'augmented estate' to include the decedent's nonprobate transfers to others, which consists of the decedent's fractional interest in property held in joint tenancy with a right of survivorship. The purpose of the modern elective-share law is to prevent the disinheritance of a surviving spouse, which can occur through nonprobate transfers just as easily as through a will. The court rejected John's argument that his survivorship right was an 'irrevocably accrued right' before the statute's enactment, holding that a joint tenant can sever the tenancy at any time, meaning the survivorship right only becomes irrevocable upon the other joint tenant's death. Therefore, the value of Nick's interest in the properties he held with John must be included when calculating the total estate from which Barbara can claim her share.
Dissenting - Allegrucci, J.
This opinion dissented only from the court's holding that a common-law marriage existed between Barbara and Nick, not from the primary holding regarding the inclusion of joint tenancy property in the augmented estate.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the protective purpose of Kansas's modern elective-share statute, which is modeled on the Uniform Probate Code. By including non-probate transfers like joint tenancies in the augmented estate, the court prevents a decedent from using such estate planning tools to circumvent a spouse's statutory inheritance rights. This precedent significantly strengthens the financial security of surviving spouses by ensuring that the elective share is calculated based on a more comprehensive and realistic view of the decedent's total wealth, rather than just the probate estate. Future cases will likely apply this broad definition of the augmented estate to other forms of non-probate transfers, furthering the policy against spousal disinheritance.
