Holmes v. Y.J.A. Realty Corp.
128 A.D.2d 482, 513 N.Y.S.2d 415 (1987)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An attorney is permitted to withdraw from representation when a client deliberately disregards their obligation to pay fees under a retainer agreement and engages in conduct that makes it unreasonably difficult for the attorney to carry out their employment effectively, provided the withdrawal does not cause undue prejudice to the parties.
Facts:
- Plaintiff initiated a personal injury action against defendants Y.J.A. Realty Corp. and its sole owner, Yori Abrahams, after she allegedly slipped and fell on a defective step in their apartment building.
- Because the defendants had no liability insurance, they retained attorney Donald J. Goldman to represent them.
- Abrahams signed a written retainer agreement on behalf of himself and the corporation, agreeing to pay Goldman's legal fees at a rate of $125 per hour for office work and $400 per day for court appearances.
- Goldman provided legal services and sent a detailed bill showing an outstanding balance of $2,275.30 after the defendants had made a partial payment of $3,500.
- For over five months, the defendants refused to pay the remaining balance, despite having the financial ability to do so.
- In addition to nonpayment, defendant Abrahams verbally berated and abused Goldman with accusations of disloyalty and conflict of interest.
Procedural Posture:
- A plaintiff sued defendants Y.J.A. Realty Corp. and Yori Abrahams in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, a trial-level court, for personal injuries.
- The defendants' attorney, Donald J. Goldman, filed a motion in the trial court to be relieved as counsel.
- The Supreme Court, Bronx County (Special Term), denied Goldman's motion to withdraw.
- Goldman, as the appellant, appealed the trial court's order to the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, an intermediate appellate court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is an attorney permitted to withdraw from representing a client when the client deliberately fails to pay legal fees as per a retainer agreement and verbally abuses the attorney, making the representation unreasonably difficult?
Opinions:
Majority - Per Curiam
Yes. An attorney is permitted to withdraw from representation under these circumstances. The court found that withdrawal is permissible under the Code of Professional Responsibility, specifically DR 2-110 (C) (1) (f), which allows withdrawal when a client 'deliberately disregards an agreement or obligations to the lawyer as to expenses or fees.' Furthermore, the client's abusive conduct, including accusations of disloyalty, rendered it 'unreasonably difficult for the lawyer to carry out his employment effectively,' justifying withdrawal under DR 2-110 (C) (1) (d). The court reasoned that an attorney is not obligated to finance litigation or provide gratuitous services when a client repudiates a reasonable fee arrangement. Crucially, the court determined that no party would be prejudiced by the withdrawal, as the case was not yet ready for trial, leaving the defendants ample time to secure new counsel and not delaying the plaintiff's case.
Analysis:
This decision reaffirms the principle that the attorney-client relationship imposes duties on both parties. It clarifies that a client's material breach of a fee agreement, especially when coupled with abusive behavior, provides sufficient grounds for an attorney's permissive withdrawal under legal ethics rules. The ruling emphasizes that the court's primary concern when considering such a motion is preventing prejudice to the parties. By allowing withdrawal in a pre-trial context where new counsel can be easily retained, the court protects attorneys from being forced to continue representation for non-paying and difficult clients.
