Hodges v. Johnson
199 P.3d 1251 (2009)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The scope of the implied warranty of merchantability for used goods is not limited as a matter of law to only those components essential for basic operation. Whether the warranty has been breached is a question of fact determined by the circumstances of the transaction, such as the product's age, price, mileage, and the seller's representations.
Facts:
- In January 2005, Jim Johnson, a used-car dealer, sold a 1995 Mercedes S320 with 135,945 miles to Dr. Merle Hodges and Melissa Hodges for $17,020.
- Johnson represented the car as being a 'nice car in good condition' and 'pretty much a perfect car.'
- Two years prior to the sale, in May 2003, Johnson had a mechanic use a product called 'Super Seal' to fix the car's air conditioner, a remedy the mechanic did not recommend.
- In February 2005, about a month after the purchase, Dr. Hodges noticed the vehicle's air conditioning did not work.
- After several failed attempts to recharge the system with Freon, a mechanic informed the Hodgeses in May 2005 that the evaporator, condenser, and compressor needed to be replaced at an estimated cost of $3,000 to $4,000.
- The Hodgeses requested that Johnson pay for the repairs, but he refused.
Procedural Posture:
- The Hodgeses filed an action against Johnson in small claims court for repair costs.
- The small claims court found in favor of the Hodgeses and awarded them $3,474 in damages plus costs.
- Johnson, as appellant, appealed the judgment to the district court.
- The district court, after a de novo hearing, affirmed the judgment for the Hodgeses (appellees) but denied their request for attorney fees.
- The Hodgeses, as appellants, appealed the denial of attorney fees to the Court of Appeals, and Johnson, as cross-appellant, appealed the judgment against him.
- The Court of Appeals reversed the district court, holding as a matter of law that the implied warranty did not cover the air conditioner.
- The Kansas Supreme Court granted the Hodgeses' petition for review.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the implied warranty of merchantability for a used vehicle, as a matter of law, extend only to major components essential for the vehicle's operation, such as the engine and transmission?
Opinions:
Majority - Davis, J.
No, the implied warranty of merchantability on a used vehicle does not, as a matter of law, extend only to major components essential for its operation. Whether a non-essential component like an air conditioner is covered by the warranty is a question of fact dependent on the circumstances of the transaction. The Court of Appeals erred by creating a bright-line rule excluding non-essential components. The statute requires goods to be fit for the 'ordinary purposes' for which they are used, which for a vehicle can include comfort, not just transportation. The determination of a breach requires a factual inquiry into factors like the car's price, age, mileage, and the seller's representations. In this case, substantial circumstantial evidence—including the prior 'Super Seal' repair and the quick failure of the A/C—supported the district court's factual finding that the defective air conditioner breached the warranty for this specific high-end vehicle.
Analysis:
This decision rejects a rigid, bright-line test for the implied warranty of merchantability on used vehicles, establishing instead a flexible, fact-specific standard. By holding that non-essential components like air conditioning can be covered, the court protects consumer expectations, especially in transactions involving high-priced or premium used goods. The ruling places a greater burden on sellers to ensure that vehicles are in a condition consistent with their price and any representations made, as courts will now examine the entire context of a sale rather than automatically excluding certain defects from warranty coverage. This precedent significantly impacts how dealers price and describe used vehicles with varying features and conditions.
