Hipolite Egg Co. v. United States
220 U.S. 45, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1660, 31 S. Ct. 364 (1911)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Commerce Clause, Congress may authorize the seizure of adulterated articles of food that have been transported in interstate commerce, even after they have reached their destination, so long as they remain in their original, unbroken packages.
Facts:
- Hipolite Egg Company of St. Louis, Missouri, prepared fifty cans of preserved whole eggs.
- The eggs contained boric acid, which was considered a deleterious and adulterating ingredient.
- Thomas & Clark, an Illinois corporation engaged in the bakery business, owned the eggs and procured their shipment from St. Louis, Missouri, to themselves at Peoria, Illinois.
- Upon receiving the shipment, Thomas & Clark placed the fifty unopened cans in the storeroom of their bakery factory.
- The eggs were intended to be used as a raw material for baking purposes and were not intended for resale to consumers in their original cans.
Procedural Posture:
- The United States initiated a libel proceeding in the U.S. District Court to confiscate fifty cans of eggs under the Food and Drugs Act of 1906.
- The Hipolite Egg Company intervened as the claimant to defend against the seizure.
- At trial, the claimant moved to dismiss the action, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction because the eggs were no longer in interstate commerce.
- The District Court overruled the motion, found the eggs were adulterated, and entered a decree confiscating them.
- The District Court also entered a personal judgment against the Hipolite Egg Company for costs.
- The Hipolite Egg Company appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court on a certified question of the trial court's jurisdiction.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the authority of Congress under the Commerce Clause extend to the seizure of adulterated articles of food under the Pure Food and Drugs Act of 1906 after they have been transported in interstate commerce and have reached their destination, while they remain in their original, unbroken packages?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Justice McKenna
Yes. The authority of Congress under the Commerce Clause extends to the seizure of adulterated food articles after they have completed their interstate journey, provided they remain in their original, unbroken packages. The Food and Drugs Act is intended to keep adulterated articles out of the channels of interstate commerce, a purpose which would be defeated if the articles could escape condemnation simply by arriving at their destination. The Court rejected the argument that the seizure provision applies only to articles shipped 'for sale,' stating the law's object is to prevent any movement and use of impure goods. The Court characterized such adulterated goods as 'outlaws of commerce,' distinguishing them from legitimate articles of trade. For such illicit articles, the federal power does not end when transit stops; it extends to seizing them at their destination to prevent their use and effectuate the protective purpose of the statute, which is a legitimate exercise of congressional power. The Court also held that by intervening to claim the property, the Hipolite Egg Company subjected itself to the court's jurisdiction for the assessment of costs.
Analysis:
This decision significantly expanded the federal government's police power under the Commerce Clause, affirming that federal authority over interstate commerce does not abruptly cease at a state's border. The Court established the principle that Congress can regulate and seize 'outlaws of commerce'—articles deemed harmful to the public—even after they have come to rest within a state, as long as they are identifiable as items of interstate commerce (e.g., in their original packages). This ruling provided a crucial foundation for subsequent federal legislation aimed at protecting public health and safety, allowing federal agencies to pursue and confiscate illicit goods to prevent them from entering the local marketplace or being used.
