Hill v. Hill
173 La. 574, 1931 La. LEXIS 1909, 138 So. 107 (1931)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Louisiana Civil Code, a compromise agreement made for the purpose of avoiding litigation cannot be rescinded or annulled for an error of law.
Facts:
- W.N. Hill initiated a homestead entry in 1872 but died in 1877 before completing it.
- His widow, Sarepty J. Hill, married the plaintiff, John H. Hill, later in 1877.
- Sarepty and John H. Hill resided on the land, and the final homestead proofs were made and the final certificate was issued in 1881, during their marriage.
- The U.S. government issued a patent for the land in 1895 to "Sarepty J. Hill, widow of W. N. Hill."
- After Sarepty's death, a dispute arose between John H. Hill and Sarepty's heirs (the defendants) over the ownership of the land; Hill claimed it was community property, while the heirs claimed it was Sarepty's separate property.
- On July 31, 1929, the parties executed a compromise agreement to settle the dispute, granting John H. Hill a life estate in the surface rights and giving the defendants full ownership, including mineral rights.
- Subsequently, a gas well was successfully drilled on the property, making the mineral rights significantly more valuable than the surface rights.
Procedural Posture:
- John H. Hill (plaintiff) filed suit in a Louisiana trial court against the heirs of Sarepty J. Hill (defendants) to annul their 1929 compromise agreement.
- The trial court rendered a judgment in favor of the defendants, rejecting the plaintiff's demand to annul the agreement.
- The plaintiff, John H. Hill, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a compromise agreement, entered into by parties to settle a good-faith legal dispute over property ownership, become voidable due to an error of law?
Opinions:
Majority - O’Niell, C. J.
No. A compromise agreement made to avoid litigation does not become voidable due to an error of law. The very purpose of such an agreement is to pretermit, not decide, the disputed legal questions between the parties. The Louisiana Civil Code, in articles 1846 and 3078, explicitly provides that a contract made to avoid litigation, known as a 'transaction' or compromise, cannot be rescinded for an error of law. Here, there was a genuine, non-frivolous dispute regarding whether the homestead property was community or separate property. The parties chose to settle this uncertain legal question rather than litigate it. The plaintiff cannot now annul that settlement by claiming he misunderstood the strength of his legal position at the time of the agreement.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the finality of compromise agreements under Louisiana law, promoting the public policy of encouraging out-of-court settlements. It establishes a clear boundary for the application of 'error of law' as a basis for rescinding a contract, carving out a firm exception for agreements made specifically to avoid litigation. By refusing to examine the merits of the underlying legal dispute, the court reinforces that the act of compromising itself, rather than the correctness of either party's original legal position, is what the law seeks to protect. This precedent ensures that settlements remain stable and reliable mechanisms for resolving disputes, as parties cannot easily unwind them with 'buyer's remorse' based on a subsequent change in legal interpretation or understanding.
