Hicks v. Londre
125 P.3d 452 (2005)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The doctrine of equitable subrogation allows a new property owner or lender who pays off a senior encumbrance to assume that senior lien's priority position over an intervening junior lienholder, provided the junior lienholder is not prejudiced by the subrogation and other equitable factors are met.
Facts:
- Donald P. Hicks obtained a judgment against Robert Grubbs and, on October 5, 2001, recorded it, creating a judgment lien on Grubbs' real property.
- Hicks' lien was fourth in priority, behind a first deed of trust held by Washington Mutual Bank and a second and third deed of trust held by Compass Bank.
- On January 14, 2002, Kent and Jennifer Londre purchased the property from Grubbs for $1,510,000.
- The Londres financed the purchase with a $1 million loan from Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation and contributed approximately $510,000 in cash.
- A title insurance search commissioned by the Londres and Chase failed to discover Hicks' properly recorded judgment lien.
- At closing, funds from the sale were used to pay off the first deed of trust held by Washington Mutual, which then released its lien.
- Compass Bank also released its second and third deeds of trust, despite receiving no proceeds from the sale.
Procedural Posture:
- Donald P. Hicks initiated a foreclosure action in the district court, asserting his judgment lien held priority over the Londres' ownership interest and Chase's deed of trust.
- The Londres and Chase asserted the affirmative defense of equitable subrogation.
- The district court entered judgment for Hicks, ruling that because the lien was properly recorded, the Londres and Chase had constructive knowledge, which barred their equitable claim.
- The Londres and Chase, as appellants, appealed to the Colorado Court of Appeals.
- The Court of Appeals reversed the district court's judgment, holding that equitable subrogation was appropriate because the appellants had only constructive, not actual, knowledge of the lien.
- Hicks, as petitioner, was granted a writ of certiorari by the Supreme Court of Colorado to review the court of appeals' decision.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the doctrine of equitable subrogation allow a new purchaser and their lender, who lacked actual knowledge of a properly recorded judgment lien, to take the priority position of the senior mortgage they satisfied, thereby moving ahead of the judgment lien?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Kourlis
Yes, the doctrine of equitable subrogation allows the new purchaser and lender to take the priority position of the senior mortgage they satisfied. The doctrine operates as a narrow exception to the Recording Act when equity demands it. The court applies a five-factor test, with the preeminent consideration being whether the intervening lienholder would be prejudiced. Here, Hicks was not prejudiced because he was left in the same, or even a better, position than he was in before the sale; his lien simply remained junior to the new primary mortgage, just as it was to the old one. The court also found that the Londres and Chase lacked actual knowledge of Hicks' lien and were not negligent in failing to discover it, as they reasonably relied on a professional title insurance commitment that omitted the lien. Therefore, equity permits them to be subrogated to the first priority position previously held by Washington Mutual.
Analysis:
This decision reaffirms the vitality of equitable subrogation in Colorado as a narrow but important exception to the state's race-notice recording statute. The court clarifies that constructive notice from a recorded lien, by itself, does not bar a claim for equitable subrogation, preventing the doctrine from being rendered obsolete. By emphasizing the lack of prejudice to the junior lienholder as the 'preeminent consideration,' the ruling establishes a balancing test that protects new purchasers and lenders from title search errors while ensuring that junior lienholders do not receive an unearned windfall by being promoted in priority.
