Hergert v. Bank of the West (In Re Hergert)
2002 Bankr. LEXIS 263, 275 B.R. 58, 47 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1 (2002)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Revised UCC Article 9, a financing statement remains effective to perfect a security interest even if, after filing, the secured party's name and address become inaccurate due to a merger, as such errors are not considered seriously misleading.
Facts:
- Neil and Marie Hergert obtained several loans from Pacific One Bank ('Pacific').
- The loans were secured by the Hergerts' farm equipment, crops, and a manufactured home.
- To secure its interests, Pacific filed a UCC-1 financing statement (for general collateral), a UCC-1F financing statement (for farm products), and was listed as the lienholder on the certificate of title for the manufactured home.
- The UCC-1 listed a Portland, Oregon address for Pacific which remained a valid mailing address for the successor bank.
- The UCC-1F listed a Nampa, Idaho address for Pacific.
- In 1998, Pacific merged into Bank of the West ('Bank'), which acquired all of Pacific's assets, including the Hergert loans.
- The Bank never amended the financing statements or the certificate of title to change the secured party's name from 'Pacific One Bank' to 'Bank of the West'.
- Sometime after the merger, the Nampa address listed on the UCC-1F became defunct, and mail sent there would be returned as undeliverable.
Procedural Posture:
- Neil and Marie Hergert ('Debtors') filed a petition for Chapter 12 bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Idaho.
- The Debtors initiated an adversary proceeding against Bank of the West ('Bank') in the same bankruptcy court.
- In the proceeding, the Debtors sought a judicial declaration that the Bank's security interests were unperfected.
- The parties submitted a pre-trial stipulation agreeing on the relevant facts and the legal issues for the court to decide.
- The bankruptcy court held a trial and received post-trial briefing from the parties.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a successor-by-merger bank's failure to amend UCC financing statements and a certificate of title to reflect its new name and a change in address render its security interests in a debtor's property unperfected?
Opinions:
Majority - Terry Myers
No. A successor-by-merger bank does not lose its perfected security interest by failing to amend financing statements to reflect its new name and address. For the manufactured home, perfection occurs upon notation on the certificate of title, and a successor in interest, like an assignee, does not need to amend the title to remain perfected. For the collateral governed by the UCC, the case is controlled by Idaho's newly enacted Revised Article 9, which became effective before the debtors filed for bankruptcy. Under Revised Article 9, a financing statement is sufficient if it provides the debtor's name, the secured party's name, and an indication of the collateral. Errors in the secured party's name or address are not considered 'seriously misleading' because third-party searches are conducted using the debtor's name, not the secured party's. While a filing office may reject a statement that lacks a proper address, if the statement is accepted for filing, it is effective. Therefore, the Bank's security interests, which were perfected by its predecessor Pacific, remained perfected on the date the Hergerts filed for bankruptcy.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the application of Revised UCC Article 9's more lenient standards for secured party information on financing statements, particularly in the context of corporate succession. By holding that a successor-by-merger is not required to amend financing statements to maintain perfection, the court reduces the administrative burdens and legal risks for secured creditors involved in corporate acquisitions. The case reinforces a key policy shift in Revised Article 9: the primary function of a financing statement is to provide notice indexed by the debtor's name, making errors in the secured party's information less critical. This provides greater certainty for lenders and simplifies commercial transactions.
