Henderson v. Irving Materials, Inc.
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15669, 94 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 976, 329 F. Supp. 2d 1002 (2004)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An employer can be held liable under Title VII for co-worker racial harassment if the harassment is severe or pervasive enough to alter the conditions of employment and create an objectively and subjectively hostile work environment, and the employer was negligent in discovering or remedying the harassment, even if some incidents are not explicitly racial but occur within a larger context of racial hostility.
Facts:
- Nathaniel Henderson, an African American, was hired by SouthSide Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. as a concrete truck driver in April 2001, becoming the first and only Black employee at the Harding Street Plant.
- From April to November 2001, co-worker Reed Moistner repeatedly told racist jokes using racially derogatory terms in the employee break room, often with plant manager Willie Taylor present and laughing.
- In September or October 2001, Moistner, in front of Henderson and Taylor, told Henderson that no one wanted him working there, and around the same time, Henderson found buttons cut from his uniform shirts and grease smeared inside his work truck.
- In October and November 2001, Moistner suggested he was a Ku Klux Klan member and threatened, in Henderson's presence, to "drag him ... down the street on the back of my pick-up truck," with Taylor corroborating Moistner's KKK membership.
- In November 2001, co-worker Mitchell Santerre twice drove his truck at Henderson in the parking lot, seemingly attempting to hit or intimidate him.
- Also in November 2001, Henderson discovered several dead mice, wrapped in napkins, planted in his work truck, an incident preceded by Santerre stating he had a "home" for a dead mouse he picked up in the break room.
- In December 2001, at a small claims court, Moistner called Henderson a "f***ing racially derogatory term."
Procedural Posture:
- Nathaniel Henderson sued SouthSide Ready Mix Concrete, Inc., Reed Moistner, and Mitchell Santerre in federal district court, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hostile work environment and retaliation) and state law claims.
- Defendants moved for summary judgment on all claims.
- Henderson abandoned his Title VII retaliation claim and all state law claims.
- The district court granted summary judgment to the individual defendants, Moistner and Santerre, on all Title VII claims against them, finding that individuals cannot be personally liable under Title VII.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an employer's failure to adequately address a continuous pattern of racially charged and implicitly threatening harassment by co-workers, which includes both explicit racial epithets and ambiguously racial acts, create a sufficiently severe or pervasive hostile work environment to establish employer liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Opinions:
Majority - Hamilton, District Judge
Yes, an employer's failure to adequately address a continuous pattern of racially charged and implicitly threatening harassment by co-workers, which includes both explicit racial epithets and ambiguously racial acts, can create a sufficiently severe or pervasive hostile work environment to establish employer liability under Title VII. The court denied SouthSide's motion for summary judgment on Henderson's hostile work environment claim, finding sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that Henderson was subjected to unwelcome harassment based on his race, which was severe or pervasive enough to alter his employment conditions, and for which SouthSide could be held liable. Citing Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. and Cerros v. Steel Technologies, Inc., the court emphasized that the "totality of the relevant circumstances" must be considered, not each incident in isolation. Explicitly racial incidents, such as Moistner's racist jokes, KKK claims, and use of racial epithets, provided essential context for seemingly non-racial acts like the cut buttons, greased truck, dead mice, and Santerre's intimidation attempts, allowing a jury to infer they were also race-based. The court particularly noted the "dragging" threat's profound racial connotations, recalling historical lynchings of Black individuals. Sufficient evidence for employer liability existed, as plant manager Willie Taylor was present for many incidents, demonstrating actual notice to management, and SouthSide's responses (a hygiene poster, quickly rescinded reprimands) were inadequate and negligent in remedying the prolonged harassment.
Analysis:
This case significantly reinforces the "totality of the circumstances" standard for hostile work environment claims under Title VII, demonstrating that incidents not explicitly racial can be considered race-based when viewed within a broader context of overt racial hostility. The ruling highlights that an employer's duty to take prompt and appropriate corrective action extends to supervisors' awareness of harassment, even if formal complaints are not immediately made to higher management. It serves as a reminder that an employer cannot dismiss a pattern of harassment as "teasing" or "banter" and must consider the historical and social context of offensive remarks and threats, especially those evoking racial violence. This decision makes it harder for employers to obtain summary judgment by attempting to disaggregate incidents or by arguing that non-explicitly racial acts cannot contribute to a hostile environment.
