Helen D. Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
299 F.2d 706, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5981, 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 628 (1962)
Rule of Law:
The commercial exploitation of a deceased person's name, reputation, or public image does not constitute the sale or exchange of 'property' for capital gains tax purposes under Internal Revenue Code Section 1221, meaning income derived from such activities is taxed as ordinary income.
Facts:
- Glenn Miller, a band leader, achieved world fame before his death in 1944.
- Petitioner, Mrs. Miller, as Glenn Miller's widow and sole beneficiary, actively engaged in enterprises exploiting his continuing popularity.
- In 1952, Mrs. Miller entered into a contract with Universal Pictures Company, Inc. for the production of a motion picture film titled 'The Glenn Miller Story'.
- Under the contract, Mrs. Miller purportedly granted Universal 'the exclusive right to produce, release, distribute and exhibit * one or more photoplays based upon the life and activities of Glenn Miller throughout the world'.
- Mrs. Miller warranted that she was 'the sole and exclusive owner of all the rights' conveyed by her.
- In the calendar year 1954, Mrs. Miller received $409,336.34 as her share of the income derived from the theatrical venture with Universal.
Procedural Posture:
- Petitioner (Mrs. Miller) contended that the payment received from Universal Pictures in 1954 should be treated, for income tax purposes, as a 'gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for more than 6 months'.
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue contended that the 1954 payment must be treated as ordinary income.
- The Tax Court sustained the Commissioner's position, holding that Mrs. Miller was compensated for services and that the payment was ordinary income.
- Petitioner appealed the Tax Court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does income received by the sole beneficiary of a deceased celebrity's estate from the commercial exploitation of the deceased's name, reputation, and life story qualify as a 'gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset' under Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code, entitling it to preferential capital gains tax treatment?
Opinions:
Majority - Kaufman, Circuit Judge
No, income received by the sole beneficiary of a deceased celebrity's estate from the commercial exploitation of the deceased's name, reputation, and life story does not qualify as a 'gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset' because these intangible rights do not constitute 'property' for capital gains tax purposes. The Internal Revenue Code does not define 'property' for Section 1221, so courts must look to Congressional purpose and narrowly apply the definition of a capital asset. The court rejected the argument that state property law or the substantial payment by Universal established a 'property right.' The court reasoned that existing case law did not support the idea that the reputation or fame of a dead person gives rise to inheritable property rights, and certainly not clear-cut rights at the time of the contract. Universal's payment was likely a purchase of 'freedom from fear' or a hedge against the chance that a new theory of property rights might emerge, rather than payment for an existing property right. The court emphasized that two individuals cannot, by agreement, create a legal principle binding on the Commissioner of Internal Revenue where none existed before. Because the definition of a capital asset must be narrowly applied to relieve taxpayers from excessive burdens on conversions of capital investments, the court concluded that beneficiaries do not receive a capitalizable 'property' in the name, reputation, right of publicity, right of privacy, or 'public image' of a deceased entertainer.
Analysis:
This case significantly clarifies the narrow interpretation of 'property' for capital gains tax purposes under IRC Section 1221, particularly concerning intangible rights related to deceased individuals. It establishes that the commercial value of a deceased celebrity's public image or life story, without clear statutory or established common law property rights, does not automatically transform into a capital asset simply because a substantial payment is made for its exploitation. This ruling impacts how income from posthumous exploitation of intellectual property and personal rights is classified, ensuring that 'capital asset' treatment is reserved for traditional capital investments and preventing parties from contractually creating tax-favored 'property' where none legally exists. It underscores the principle that tax law definitions are independent of ordinary contractual understandings.
