Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp.
781 F.2d 1022, 1986 A.M.C. 2635 (1986)
Sections
Rule of Law:
Federal admiralty jurisdiction extends to all areas within the mean high water mark of tidal waters, regardless of the tide's actual level at the time of the incident, provided the alleged wrong bears a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity.
Facts:
- Four men sailed two eighteen-foot Hobie Cat sailboats across Pamlico Sound to Silver Lake in Ocracoke, North Carolina.
- Around 1:00 p.m., the group decided to beach their vessels.
- While the men were maneuvering the Hassinger boat onto the sand, its metal mast contacted an energized, uninsulated power line carrying 7,200 volts of electricity.
- The power line was owned and operated by Tideland Electric Membership Corporation.
- At the time of the accident, the boat was positioned below the mean high water mark, though evidence conflicted on whether it was partially in the water or entirely on the sand due to the tide.
- The electrical contact threw one man clear, but electrocuted and killed the other three men.
- The power line lacked warning signs, signals, or buoys to alert sailors to the danger.
Procedural Posture:
- Administrators for the three decedents filed lawsuits against the power company (Tideland) and the boat manufacturers (Coleman and Catamaran) in the U.S. District Court.
- Plaintiffs asserted subject matter jurisdiction based on admiralty law.
- Defendants filed motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), arguing the court lacked admiralty jurisdiction.
- The District Court denied the motions to dismiss, ruling that admiralty jurisdiction existed.
- The District Court certified the issue of jurisdiction for an interlocutory appeal.
- The defendants appealed the jurisdictional ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does federal admiralty jurisdiction extend to an electrocution accident occurring when a sailboat's mast strikes an overhead power line while the vessel is beached below the mean high water mark, even if the tide has receded?
Opinions:
Majority - Judge McMillan
Yes. Admiralty jurisdiction exists because the accident occurred within the boundaries of navigable waters and bore a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity. The Court affirmed the district court's decision, rejecting the appellants' argument that jurisdiction stops at the water's edge at the specific moment of an accident. Citing The Steamship Jefferson and United States v. Stoeco Homes, Inc., the Court determined that in tidal areas, 'navigable water' extends to the mean high water mark at all times, not merely where the water happens to be during a specific tide. Since the vessel and the decedents were below the mean high water mark, the 'situs' requirement was met. regarding the 'nexus' requirement, the Court applied the four-factor test from Oman v. Johns-Manville Corp., finding that beaching a boat is a traditional function of sailors and that an uninsulated power line poses a hazard to navigation. Therefore, the dispute properly belongs in federal admiralty court.
Analysis:
This decision significantly clarifies the geographic boundaries of federal admiralty jurisdiction in tidal areas. By firmly establishing the 'mean high water mark' as the bright-line boundary rather than the fluctuating water's edge, the Fourth Circuit eliminated uncertainty regarding accidents that occur on beaches or tidal flats during low tide. This ruling ensures that maritime torts—such as injuries involving vessels during beaching or launching—remain under uniform federal admiralty law rather than shifting between state and federal courts based on the time of day or tidal charts. Additionally, the case reinforces the application of the Executive Jet nexus test to land-based hazards (like power lines) that threaten maritime navigation.
Gunnerbot
AI-powered case assistant
Loaded: Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp. (1986)
Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"