Harris v. Harris
369 P.2d 481, 57 Cal. 2d 367, 19 Cal. Rptr. 793 (1962)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A spouse's right to void an unauthorized gift of community property made by the other spouse is a property right, not a personal right. Therefore, this right survives the spouse's death and may be exercised by their personal representative on behalf of the estate.
Facts:
- Marshall C. Harris and Susie Almeda Harris were married in 1894.
- In 1948, Susie Harris was declared legally incompetent and Marshall Harris was appointed her guardian.
- Between 1950 and March 28, 1957, Marshall Harris, while acting as his wife's guardian, made gifts of community property totaling $29,543.76 to the defendants.
- On March 28, 1957, the couple's son, the plaintiff, replaced Marshall Harris as Susie Harris's guardian.
- After March 28, 1957, Marshall Harris made additional gifts of community property valued at $26,665.89 to the defendants.
- Susie Harris, being incompetent, never consented to any of the gifts made by her husband.
- Susie Harris died on September 26, 1957, and Marshall Harris died on December 10, 1957.
Procedural Posture:
- The plaintiff, as executor of Susie Almeda Harris's estate, filed an action in the trial court to recover community property transferred by Marshall Harris.
- The trial court entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
- The defendants appealed the trial court's judgment to the Supreme Court of California.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a wife's right to void unauthorized gifts of community personal property made by her husband survive her death, allowing the executor of her estate to recover her one-half interest in the gifted property?
Opinions:
Majority - Traynor, J.
Yes. A wife's right to void unauthorized gifts of community property survives her death and can be exercised by her estate's executor. Under California Civil Code § 161a, a wife has a 'present, existing and equal interest' in community property, which is a vested property right. A husband's unauthorized gift of that property constitutes an invasion of this right. A cause of action for the violation of a property right survives the death of its owner pursuant to Civil Code § 954. Therefore, the right to set aside such gifts is a property right that survives the wife and may be exercised by her personal representative to recover her one-half interest. Furthermore, Marshall Harris, while acting as his wife's guardian, had no authority to consent on her behalf to the gifts without prior court permission, which was never obtained.
Dissenting - McComb, J.
No. The right to avoid a transfer of community property made by a husband in violation of statute is personal to the wife and is intended solely for her benefit and protection. As a personal right, it does not survive her death. If the wife, or her guardian during her incompetency, fails to act during her lifetime to invalidate the gift, the gift becomes valid in its entirety upon her death. The cause of action is not assignable and, being purely personal, it cannot be exercised by the executor of her estate.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies a spouse's interest in community property as a durable, vested property right rather than a mere personal privilege. By holding that the right to void an unauthorized gift survives death, the court prevents a managing spouse from dissipating the community estate and defeating the other spouse's interest, especially when the other spouse is incompetent. This ruling strengthens the protections afforded to non-managing spouses and ensures their estates can vindicate their property rights, thereby preserving the community property for their heirs. It establishes that such rights are not extinguished by death and become part of the decedent's estate.
