Harper v. Poway Unified School District
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 9879, 445 F.3d 1166, 2006 WL 1043082 (2006)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A public school may, consistent with the First Amendment, prohibit student speech that intrudes upon the rights of other students, including derogatory and injurious speech directed at a core identifying characteristic such as sexual orientation.
Facts:
- Poway High School had a history of on-campus conflict and physical altercations among students related to issues of sexual orientation, particularly surrounding a 'Day of Silence' event.
- In 2003, some students were suspended following altercations resulting from anti-homosexual comments and T-shirts.
- The school's Gay-Straight Alliance held another 'Day of Silence' in April 2004 to promote tolerance.
- The day after the 2004 event, Tyler Chase Harper, a sophomore, wore a T-shirt to school with “BE ASHAMED, OUR SCHOOL EMBRACED WHAT GOD HAS CONDEMNED” on the front and “HOMOSEXUALITY IS SHAMEFUL ‘Romans 1:27’” on the back.
- A teacher observed that the shirt caused students to be off-task and talking about its content.
- Harper informed the school principal that he had been involved in a 'tense verbal conversation' with other students about the shirt earlier that day.
- School officials, citing past conflicts and the inflammatory nature of the shirt, ordered Harper to remove it.
- When Harper refused to remove the T-shirt, school officials required him to spend the remainder of the school day in the front office, but he was not suspended or otherwise formally disciplined.
Procedural Posture:
- Tyler Chase Harper filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court against Poway Unified School District and certain school officials.
- Harper alleged violations of his First Amendment rights (free speech, free exercise of religion, Establishment Clause), as well as equal protection and due process claims.
- Harper filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the school from prohibiting him from wearing the T-shirt.
- The district court denied Harper's motion for a preliminary injunction.
- Harper filed an interlocutory appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, challenging the district court's denial of his motion.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a public high school's prohibition of a student's T-shirt, which condemns homosexuality in derogatory terms, violate the student's First Amendment free speech rights when the school acts to protect other students from psychological injury and preserve their right to an education?
Opinions:
Majority - Reinhardt, J.
No, the school's prohibition of the T-shirt does not violate the student's First Amendment rights. Under Tinker v. Des Moines, a school may restrict student speech that 'intrudes upon... the rights of other students.' This includes the right of students to 'be secure and to be let alone,' which encompasses freedom from psychological attacks on core identifying characteristics like race, religion, or sexual orientation. Speech that demeans and injures students based on their minority status damages their sense of security, interferes with their educational development, and infringes on their right to learn. The school's compelling interest in protecting students from such psychological harm and preserving a safe educational environment outweighs Harper's free speech interest in wearing the shirt on campus. This restriction is permissible even if it constitutes viewpoint discrimination, as it is narrowly tailored to prevent injury to other students.
Dissenting - Kozinski, J.
Yes, the school's prohibition of the T-shirt violates the student's First Amendment rights. The school failed to demonstrate that the T-shirt was likely to cause a 'substantial disruption' under Tinker, as the evidence of a few off-task students and one 'tense conversation' is insufficient. The majority improperly expands Tinker's 'rights of others' prong to create a new, unsupported right to be free from offensive speech. This novel doctrine lacks evidentiary support in the record and gives school officials unchecked power to engage in viewpoint discrimination by silencing one side of a political debate. Harper's T-shirt was a response to a school-tolerated political event (the 'Day of Silence'), and gagging his opposing viewpoint while permitting the other is inconsistent with First Amendment principles.
Analysis:
This decision significantly broadens the 'rights of others' prong of the Tinker standard for student speech. It establishes that this prong is not limited to protecting students from tangible torts like defamation or assault, but also protects them from psychological injury caused by derogatory speech targeting core characteristics of their identity. The ruling provides a new legal basis for schools to regulate student speech that is not necessarily disruptive but is deemed harmful to the well-being and educational opportunities of other students, particularly those in vulnerable minority groups. This precedent may empower schools to restrict a wider range of what they consider to be 'hate speech,' potentially creating tension with students' rights to express controversial or unpopular political and religious viewpoints.
Unlock the full brief for Harper v. Poway Unified School District