Hannah v. State
23 A.3d 192, 420 Md. 339, 2011 Md. LEXIS 429 (2011)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A defendant's fictional artistic works, such as rap lyrics, that contain generic themes of violence are not admissible as character evidence to prove a propensity for violence. For such evidence to be admissible, its probative value must not be substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, which is particularly high when the work is not autobiographical or specifically related to the charged offense.
Facts:
- In early April 2007, Justin Ray Hannah's former girlfriend ended their relationship.
- On the evening of April 14, 2007, Hannah repeatedly called his ex-girlfriend while she was with her new boyfriend.
- Hannah and his ex-girlfriend agreed that she and her new boyfriend would meet him in a church parking lot.
- At approximately 3:00 a.m. on April 15, 2007, the ex-girlfriend and her new boyfriend were in a truck in the parking lot when Hannah drove past in his car with a passenger.
- Someone from Hannah's car fired three shots at the truck, but no one was injured.
- Shortly after the shooting, Hannah called his ex-girlfriend, and a witness heard the caller say words to the effect of, “Your boy’s done, this is finished, that is why we popped shots.”
- During a search of Hannah's bedroom, police recovered a composition book from 2005 containing rap lyrics and drawings he had created that dealt with guns and violence.
Procedural Posture:
- The State prosecuted Justin Ray Hannah in the Circuit Court for Harford County.
- A jury convicted Hannah of attempted murder.
- Hannah, as appellant, appealed his conviction to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, the state's intermediate appellate court.
- The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment in an unreported opinion.
- Hannah, as Petitioner, filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Court of Appeals of Maryland, the state's highest court, which the court granted.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the admission of a defendant's violent rap lyrics, written two years before the alleged offense, constitute unfairly prejudicial character evidence when used to rebut the defendant's trial testimony that he had no interest in or access to guns?
Opinions:
Majority - Murphy, J.
Yes, the admission of the rap lyrics was an abuse of discretion because their probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. The court distinguishes between admissible autobiographical statements of historical fact and inadmissible works of fiction. Hannah's lyrics, written two years prior to the crime, were not shown to be autobiographical or connected to the specific facts of the shooting. Instead, they served only as improper character evidence to portray Hannah as having a propensity for violence. The prosecutor's repetitive cross-examination on each lyric exacerbated this prejudice, which was not harmless error given the State's case, while strong, was not overwhelming.
Concurring - Harrell, J.
Yes, the conviction should be reversed due to the prejudicial nature of the evidence, but the majority's reasoning is overly broad. The rap lyrics became relevant for rebuttal and impeachment purposes once Hannah testified on direct examination that he had no knowledge of or interest in guns, thereby opening the door. The error was not in admitting the lyrics at all, but in the excessive and cumulative manner in which the prosecutor used them. A limited and discriminating use of a few selected lyrics and the drawing would have been permissible to challenge Hannah's credibility and his asserted defense of ignorance; however, the prosecutor's use of all ten lyrics crossed the line into being more prejudicial than probative.
Analysis:
This decision establishes a significant precedent in Maryland law regarding the use of artistic expression as evidence in criminal trials. It heightens the barrier for admitting creative works like rap lyrics, cautioning that their primary effect is often to create unfair prejudice by painting the defendant as having a violent character. The court mandates a careful balancing test, requiring a direct link between the lyrics' content and the specific crime to overcome their inherent prejudice. This ruling forces prosecutors to show that such lyrics are autobiographical or relevant for a purpose other than proving criminal propensity, thereby protecting defendants from being convicted based on their artistic tastes or fictional writings.
