Hannah v. Sibcy Cline Realtors
147 Ohio App.3d 198, 769 N.E.2d 876 (2001)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A real estate agent or broker does not have a fiduciary duty to inform a client about the ethnic diversity of a neighborhood or to direct the client to resources that provide such information. Imposing such a duty would create a potential conflict with the agent's obligation to avoid unlawful 'steering' under the Fair Housing Act.
Facts:
- Joel and Zondra Hannah, an African-American family, were relocating from Virginia to the Cincinnati, Ohio area in 1997.
- They engaged Mary Kay Carroll, a real estate agent with Sibcy Cline, to find a home.
- The Hannahs explicitly informed Carroll that one of their primary criteria for a new home was an ethnically diverse neighborhood.
- Throughout the year-long process, Zondra Hannah repeatedly asked Carroll for information regarding the ethnic diversity of neighborhoods, but Carroll stated she could not provide that information.
- At Zondra's urging for information after making an offer on a house in Milford, Carroll allegedly told her that she had recently sold a home in Milford to a Black family and they were very happy there.
- The Hannahs purchased the home in Milford.
- After moving in, the Hannahs' three sons were regularly subjected to racial slurs and taunts at school, and the family felt unwelcome in the community.
- After about one year, the Hannahs sold their home and, after conducting their own research using resources like the library and fair housing organizations, moved to Symmes Township.
Procedural Posture:
- Joel and Zondra Hannah filed a lawsuit against Sibcy Cline, Inc. and Mary Kay Carroll in the trial court.
- The Hannahs' complaint alleged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud.
- The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Sibcy Cline and Carroll, on all claims.
- The Hannahs, as appellants, appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to this intermediate court of appeals; Sibcy Cline and Carroll are the appellees.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a real estate agent's fiduciary duty to a buyer include the duty to inform the buyer of a neighborhood's ethnic diversity or to direct the buyer to resources that provide such information?
Opinions:
Majority - Painter, Judge.
No. A real estate agent or broker does not have a fiduciary duty to disclose the racial composition of a neighborhood or to direct clients to specific resources for that information. The court reasoned that imposing such a duty would place agents in an untenable position, creating a direct conflict with their obligation to avoid 'steering' under the federal Fair Housing Act. 'Steering' involves using words or actions to influence a buyer's choice of a neighborhood on a racial basis. Providing such information, even at a buyer's request, could expose an agent to liability for steering and for potentially preserving patterns of racial segregation. The court also held there is no duty to direct clients to specific resources, noting the statutory duty is only to advise clients to obtain expert advice when necessary, which the Hannahs should have known to do once Carroll stated she could not provide the information. Finally, the court dismissed the fraud claim, reasoning the Hannahs could not have justifiably relied on a vague statement about one other 'happy' family as a guarantee of an entire community's diversity or their own future happiness.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the scope of a real estate agent's fiduciary duties by carving out an exception for providing information on neighborhood racial composition. It prioritizes the agent's duty to comply with anti-discrimination laws, like the Fair Housing Act's prohibition on steering, over the duty to fulfill a client's specific informational requests on sensitive demographic topics. The ruling effectively shifts the burden of due diligence for subjective community characteristics, such as ethnic diversity, from the agent to the buyer. This precedent provides a legal shield for real estate professionals who refuse to discuss racial demographics but places buyers in the position of having to conduct this research independently.
