Hall v. Hall
818 S.E.2d 838 (2018)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under West Virginia's descent and distribution statutes, a child may not inherit from a biological parent who dies intestate if that parent's parental rights were previously terminated. The termination severs the legal 'parent-child relationship' required to establish the child as a 'descendant' for purposes of intestate succession.
Facts:
- Michaelin Brooke Hall is the biological child of Michael Eugene Hall and Kathy Hall French.
- Michael Hall abused Michaelin, which led to an abuse and neglect petition being filed against him.
- In April 2008, Michael Hall voluntarily relinquished his parental rights with respect to Michaelin.
- Kathy Hall French and Michael Hall divorced in July 2008.
- Michael Hall never remarried and fathered no other children.
- On April 3, 2011, Michael Hall died without a will (intestate).
Procedural Posture:
- Kathy Hall French, as mother and next friend of Michaelin, filed an action in the Circuit Court of Mercer County against Lona Sue Hall and other relatives of the decedent, Michael Hall, claiming Michaelin was his rightful heir.
- The complaint was later amended to name Michaelin, who had reached the age of majority, as the plaintiff.
- Both Michaelin and the Defendants filed motions for summary judgment in the circuit court.
- The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the Defendants, finding that Michaelin could not inherit from Michael Hall's estate.
- Michaelin (appellant) appealed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the biological child of a deceased parent whose parental rights were terminated prior to his death qualify as a descendant of the parent for purposes of intestate succession under West Virginia Code § 42-1-1 et seq.?
Opinions:
Majority - Davis, Justice
No, a biological child whose parent's parental rights have been terminated does not qualify as a descendant for purposes of intestate succession. West Virginia's intestacy statute provides that an estate passes to the decedent's 'descendants.' The statute defines 'descendant' as requiring a 'relationship of parent and child.' It further defines 'parent' as a person entitled to take from the child by intestate succession. Because a parent whose rights have been terminated is no longer legally recognized as a 'parent' and has no right to inherit from the child, the legal parent-child relationship is severed. Without this relationship, the child does not meet the statutory definition of a 'descendant' and is therefore barred from inheriting from the terminated parent's intestate estate.
Dissenting - Workman, Chief Justice
Yes, a biological child whose parent's parental rights were terminated does qualify as a descendant for purposes of intestate succession. The termination of a parent's rights should not extinguish the child's rights, as these rights are not reciprocal. The statutory definition of 'parent' is only relevant to determine if the parent can inherit from the child, not the reverse. The majority's holding ignores the plain language that an estate passes to descendants, which Michaelin clearly is, and creates a judge-made exception not found in the statute. This interpretation runs contrary to the public policy of protecting a child's welfare, as previously established in cases allowing a child's right to support to continue after termination of parental rights.
Analysis:
This decision establishes a bright-line rule in West Virginia that the termination of parental rights severs the parent-child relationship for the purposes of intestate succession, thereby extinguishing the child's right to inherit. The ruling differentiates the right to inherit, which is governed by strict statutory definitions in probate law, from other rights like child support that may survive termination under child welfare statutes. By declining to preserve the child's inheritance rights in the absence of explicit legislative direction, the court places the onus on the legislature to amend the statutes if it wishes to protect such children, aligning West Virginia with states that require specific statutory language to this effect.
