Hadassah v. Melcer

District Court of Appeal of Florida
268 So. 3d 759 (2019)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

Under the Florida Trust Code, a charitable organization designated to receive trust assets upon the termination of the interests of all current beneficiaries is a 'qualified beneficiary.' This determination is made by hypothetically and simultaneously terminating the interests of all current distributees to see who would be next in line to receive the property.


Facts:

  • In 1989, Sylvia Gelt created an irrevocable trust.
  • The trust provided that after the deaths of Sylvia and her husband, Samuel, the trust assets would be divided into three separate trusts for their three daughters.
  • The daughters have the right to receive income and principal distributions from their respective trusts during their lifetimes.
  • The trust directs that when one daughter dies, her share is to be redistributed to the trust(s) of the surviving daughter(s).
  • Upon the death of the last surviving daughter, the trust terminates and the remaining principal and income are to be distributed to three named charities.
  • Sylvia and Samuel Gelt both passed away, with Samuel dying in 2016.
  • The three daughters are currently alive and are the present distributees of their respective trusts.

Procedural Posture:

  • The trustee filed an action in a Florida trial court seeking to resign.
  • The trustee named both the daughters and the charities as defendants, alleging all were 'qualified beneficiaries.'
  • The daughters filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing the charities were not qualified beneficiaries.
  • The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment in favor of the daughters.
  • Hadassah, one of the three charities, appealed the trial court's ruling to the intermediate court of appeal.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a charitable remainder beneficiary, whose interest is contingent upon the death of all current life beneficiaries, have the rights of a 'qualified beneficiary' under Florida Trust Code § 736.0110(1)(b)?


Opinions:

Majority - Kanner, Daniel J., Associate Judge

Yes. A charitable remainder beneficiary qualifies as a 'qualified beneficiary' under the plain language of the Florida Trust Code § 736.0110(1)(b). The statute requires determining who would be a distributee upon the 'termination of the interests of other distributees.' The court reasoned that the plural 'interests' contemplates a hypothetical, simultaneous termination of all current beneficiaries' interests. If the interests of all three daughters were terminated at once, the charities would be the distributees. The lower court erred by interpreting this to mean a sequential termination of each daughter's interest, which is contrary to the statute's plain language.



Analysis:

This decision clarifies the scope of who is considered a 'qualified beneficiary' in Florida, specifically extending this status to remainder beneficiaries whose interests are not yet possessory. By doing so, it grants these beneficiaries the right to receive information and accountings from the trustee, enhancing their ability to protect their future interests. This holding increases the administrative and fiduciary duties of trustees, who must now account to a potentially wider class of beneficiaries, and solidifies that statutory interpretation should focus on the hypothetical scenarios posed by the text, not the practical, real-world sequence of events.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Hadassah v. Melcer (2019) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.