Guthrie v. Powell
290 P.2d 834, 1955 Kan. LEXIS 331, 178 Kan. 587 (1955)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A plaintiff can state a valid cause of action for negligence under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur by alleging that an injury was caused by an instrumentality under the defendant's exclusive control, where the event is one that would not ordinarily occur without negligence, even if no specific negligent acts are alleged.
Facts:
- The defendants were partners who operated the Winfield Sales Company, a community livestock and merchandise auction business.
- The business was conducted in a building with a second-story livestock pavilion located directly above a ground-floor room where patrons congregated.
- On April 15, 1953, the plaintiff, Guthrie, was a customer and invitee at the defendants' business.
- Guthrie was seated in a chair on the ground floor of the main building.
- While she was seated, a 600-pound steer fell through the ceiling from the second-story livestock pavilion above her.
- The steer landed directly on top of Guthrie, knocking her unconscious and causing serious and permanent injuries.
- The premises, business operations, and the steer that fell were under the sole and exclusive management and control of the defendants.
Procedural Posture:
- Guthrie filed a petition in a Kansas trial court seeking damages for personal injuries from the partners of the Winfield Sales Company.
- Each defendant filed a demurrer to the petition, arguing that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because it did not allege specific acts of negligence.
- The trial court considered and overruled the defendants' demurrers.
- The defendants, as appellants, appealed the trial court's order to the Supreme Court of Kansas.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a petition state a valid cause of action for negligence under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur when it alleges that a steer, under the defendants' exclusive control, fell through a ceiling and injured the plaintiff, without specifying the defendants' particular negligent acts?
Opinions:
Majority - Harvey, C. J.
Yes. A petition states a valid cause of action for negligence under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur under these circumstances. The court reasoned that the facts alleged—a steer falling through a ceiling onto a patron—describe an occurrence that would not have taken place in the ordinary course of events without some form of negligence. Because the defendants had sole and exclusive control over the premises and the livestock, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies, allowing an inference of negligence without the plaintiff needing to plead specific negligent acts. The defendants' arguments regarding their lack of knowledge or other possible explanations for the event are matters of defense to be presented at trial, not grounds for dismissing the case at the pleading stage.
Analysis:
This case serves as a quintessential, and memorable, example of the application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. It reinforces the principle that in certain accidents where the circumstances strongly suggest negligence and the defendant had exclusive control, the plaintiff is relieved of the burden of proving a specific act of negligence. The decision allows the case to proceed to discovery and trial, effectively shifting the burden of producing evidence to the defendant to explain how the accident could have occurred without their negligence. It underscores the doctrine's role in preventing manifest injustice when a plaintiff is injured under circumstances where direct evidence of the defendant's conduct is unavailable to them.
Unlock the full brief for Guthrie v. Powell