Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Company v. Montoli & Pitre, LLC
138 So. 3d 57, 2014 WL 970155, 13 La.App. 5 Cir. 784 (2014)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Louisiana law, a mandate (power of attorney) must expressly authorize an agent to bind a principal as a surety; however, language authorizing an agent to execute all necessary documents for a specific loan transaction "as fully as [the principal] could do if she were personally present and acting for herself" satisfies this requirement.
Facts:
- Jerry H. Muhs and Wanda C. Muhs were the owners and members of a company, Montoli & Pitre, LLC.
- On September 28, 2009, Wanda C. Muhs executed a power of attorney appointing Jerry H. Muhs as her agent.
- The power of attorney authorized Mr. Muhs to act for Ms. Muhs 'in connection with a loan transaction with Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Company' and did not mention the LLC.
- On September 30, 2009, Montoli & Pitre, LLC secured a $132,000 loan from Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company.
- As part of the loan transaction, Mr. Muhs signed a commercial guaranty on behalf of Ms. Muhs, using the power of attorney to obligate her personally as a surety for the LLC's debt.
- Beginning in October 2011, the LLC defaulted on its loan payments.
Procedural Posture:
- Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company filed suit against Montoli & Pitre, LLC, Mr. Muhs, and Ms. Muhs in a state trial court.
- The Bank moved for summary judgment against all defendants.
- The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Bank, finding all defendants liable for the loan.
- Ms. Muhs, as appellant, filed a devolutive appeal to the Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal; the LLC and Mr. Muhs did not appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a power of attorney that authorizes an agent to act for a principal in a specific loan transaction and to execute all necessary documents 'as fully as the principal could do if she were personally present and acting for herself' provide the express authority required by law for the agent to bind the principal as a personal surety for the loan?
Opinions:
Majority - Wicker, J.
Yes. A power of attorney that grants authority for a specific loan transaction and empowers the agent to act as the principal would 'for herself' provides sufficient express authority for the agent to bind the principal as a personal surety. Louisiana Civil Code article 2997 requires express authority for an agent to make the principal a surety. The court found this requirement was met because the power of attorney was not a general grant of authority; it was created specifically for the loan transaction with Gulf Coast Bank just two days before the loan was executed. Critically, the language authorizing Mr. Muhs to act 'as fully as [Ms. Muhs] could do if she were personally present and acting for herself' was interpreted to confer authority to bind her in her personal capacity, not merely as a member of the LLC. The court also noted that even if the mandate was not sufficiently express, Ms. Muhs caused the bank to reasonably believe Mr. Muhs had the authority to act as her agent for this purpose, thereby binding her under the doctrine of apparent authority.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the 'express authority' requirement for suretyship under Louisiana's mandate laws. It establishes that a power of attorney does not need to use the specific words 'surety' or 'guaranty' to be valid for that purpose. Instead, courts will look at the totality of the circumstances, including the specificity of the transaction, the timing of the mandate, and language indicating an intent to grant authority in a personal capacity. This provides lenders greater assurance when relying on powers of attorney that are narrowly tailored to a specific transaction, while cautioning principals that broad grants of power, even for a single deal, can lead to personal liability.
