Groupe v. Hill (In Re Hill)
156 B.R. 998 (1993)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A subsequent bona fide purchaser for value who acquires real property without knowledge of a debtor's bankruptcy is protected from a trustee's recovery powers under 11 U.S.C. §§ 549(c) and 550(b), even if the initial post-petition transfer from the debtor violated the automatic stay under § 362, provided the trustee failed to record a notice of the bankruptcy petition in the relevant property records before the subsequent transfer.
Facts:
- The Debtor owned real property (the 'Property') when she filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which she later converted to Chapter 7.
- After the conversion to Chapter 7, the Debtor conveyed the Property to Buy Right Investments, Inc. ('Buy Right') via a quitclaim deed.
- Buy Right expended approximately $18,000 to improve the Property.
- Several months later, Buy Right conveyed the Property to Doris Gunn ('Gunn') for $49,500 via a warranty deed.
- To finance the purchase, Gunn obtained a mortgage on the Property from Wesav Mortgage Corp. ('Wesav').
- At the time of their respective transactions, neither Gunn nor Wesav had any knowledge of the Debtor's bankruptcy case.
- The bankruptcy Trustee did not file a copy of the bankruptcy petition with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds until after Gunn and Wesav had acquired and recorded their interests in the Property.
Procedural Posture:
- The Debtor's Chapter 13 bankruptcy case was voluntarily converted to Chapter 7, and Leonard M. Groupe was appointed as the Trustee.
- The Trustee filed an adversary proceeding in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois against Buy Right, Gunn, and Wesav.
- The Trustee's complaint sought to void the property transfers as a violation of the automatic stay and to recover the Property for the bankruptcy estate under § 542.
- Gunn and Wesav filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting they were protected as bona fide purchasers under §§ 549(c) and 550(b).
- The Trustee filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, arguing the initial transfer was void ab initio, precluding any subsequent purchaser from obtaining good title.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the 'bona fide purchaser' defense under Bankruptcy Code §§ 549(c) and 550(b) protect a subsequent good faith purchaser for value from a trustee's attempt to recover real property that was initially transferred by the debtor post-petition in violation of the automatic stay under § 362?
Opinions:
Majority - John H. Squires, Bankruptcy Judge
Yes. The 'bona fide purchaser' defense under Bankruptcy Code §§ 549(c) and 550(b) protects a subsequent good faith purchaser for value from a trustee's attempt to recover real property initially transferred in violation of the automatic stay. While actions taken in violation of the automatic stay under § 362 are generally void, §§ 549(c) and 550(b) provide specific statutory exceptions for the benefit of subsequent bona fide purchasers and encumbrancers without notice. The Trustee's failure to provide constructive notice by timely recording the bankruptcy petition in the county real estate records is fatal to his recovery action against Gunn and Wesav, who took their interests for value, in good faith, and without knowledge of the bankruptcy or the voidability of the prior transfer. The Trustee cannot circumvent these defenses by framing his action as a turnover request under § 542, as the defenses apply to the substance of the recovery effort, not the specific Code section invoked.
Analysis:
This decision harmonizes the powerful, general prohibition of the automatic stay (§ 362) with the specific, narrow protections afforded to good faith purchasers of real property (§§ 549(c) and 550(b)). It clarifies that the BFP defenses act as an explicit exception to the rule that stay violations are void ab initio. The ruling establishes a clear precedent that the onus is on the bankruptcy trustee to protect estate assets by promptly recording notice of the bankruptcy in local property records. A trustee's failure to do so can result in the permanent loss of real property to an innocent subsequent purchaser, reinforcing the importance of state law recording statutes in the bankruptcy context.
Unlock the full brief for Groupe v. Hill (In Re Hill)