Gianetti v. Norwalk Hospital
211 Conn. 51, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 109, 557 A.2d 1249 (1989)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
While a hospital's medical staff bylaws do not, by themselves, constitute a contract due to a pre-existing legal duty to create them, a contractual relationship is formed once a hospital grants privileges to a physician. The bylaws then become an integral and enforceable part of that contract, and administrative decisions made under them are subject to judicial review.
Facts:
- Dr. Charles D. Gianetti, a plastic surgeon, was appointed to the provisional medical staff of Norwalk Hospital in 1974.
- In 1976, Norwalk Hospital granted Dr. Gianetti full privileges as an assistant attending physician.
- As a condition of his staff membership, Dr. Gianetti agreed in writing to abide by the medical staff bylaws of Norwalk Hospital.
- The hospital renewed Dr. Gianetti's privileges annually for several years, through the period ending December 31, 1983.
- In 1983, after following certain internal procedures, the medical staff of Norwalk Hospital voted to deny Dr. Gianetti's reappointment for the upcoming year.
- The hospital's board of trustees subsequently ratified the medical staff's recommendation, finalizing Dr. Gianetti's nonreappointment.
Procedural Posture:
- Charles D. Gianetti sued Norwalk Hospital and several individuals in a Connecticut trial court (Superior Court) for breach of contract and other claims.
- The case was referred to an attorney state trial referee for a hearing.
- The referee found that the hospital's bylaws were an enforceable contract and that the hospital had breached it.
- The hospital filed an objection to the acceptance of the referee's report.
- Before the trial court ruled on the objection, the parties filed a joint motion to reserve questions of law for the advice of the state's intermediate appellate court.
- The trial court granted the motion, but the state's highest court (Connecticut Supreme Court) transferred the case to itself for decision.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Are administrative decisions by Norwalk Hospital regarding a medical staff member's rights under its bylaws subject to judicial review?
Opinions:
Majority - Healey, J.
Yes, administrative decisions by Norwalk Hospital regarding a staff member's rights under its bylaws are subject to judicial review. While the bylaws alone do not form a contract—because the hospital has a pre-existing regulatory duty to create them, meaning there is no valid consideration—a contractual relationship is formed when the hospital takes the additional step of granting privileges to a physician. The hospital's grant of privileges (an act it is not required to do) and the physician's corresponding promise to abide by the bylaws create mutual obligations supported by valid consideration. Once this relationship exists, the bylaws become an 'integral part of the contract.' Therefore, the rights and duties arising from this contract, including the hospital's adherence to its own bylaw procedures, can be enforced and reviewed by a court.
Analysis:
This decision establishes a crucial pathway for judicial review of private hospital staffing decisions, which were traditionally shielded from court intervention under the 'rule of nonreview.' By grounding the physician's rights in contract law, the court sidestepped the often-rigid public/private hospital dichotomy. The ruling signifies that once a hospital grants privileges, it is contractually bound to follow its own self-imposed rules and procedures. This creates a new precedent in the jurisdiction, giving physicians legal recourse to challenge non-reappointment or disciplinary actions that they believe violate the hospital's established bylaws.
