Gautreau v. Gautreau
697 So.2d 1339, 1997 WL 331012 (1997)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A spouse who has exclusive use of a community-owned vehicle after the termination of the community is not entitled to reimbursement from the other spouse for payments, maintenance, or insurance expenses incurred during the period of exclusive use, as it is inequitable to require reimbursement for a depreciating asset enjoyed solely by one party.
Facts:
- Brian K. Gautreau and Elizabeth S. Gautreau were married on February 13, 1982.
- Prior to the marriage, on February 12, 1982, Ms. Gautreau executed a matrimonial agreement declaring her intention to reserve the fruits of her separate property for her separate use.
- During the marriage, the couple acquired a 1990 red Chevrolet pickup truck.
- Ms. Gautreau made a $3,000 down payment on the truck from her separate checking account, but both parties' names appeared on the vehicle's title.
- Most of the subsequent payments on the truck were made with community funds.
- After the parties physically separated on May 27, 1993, Mr. Gautreau had exclusive use of the 1990 red Chevrolet pickup truck.
- During his period of exclusive use, Mr. Gautreau made payments on the truck note and paid for its insurance, maintenance, and upkeep.
Procedural Posture:
- Brian Gautreau filed a petition for divorce against Elizabeth Gautreau in a Louisiana trial court.
- The case involved disputes over child custody and the partition of community property.
- A trial was held on the merits of the custody and property issues.
- The trial court entered a judgment granting sole custody to Mr. Gautreau and partitioning the community property.
- As part of the property partition, the trial court ordered Ms. Gautreau to reimburse Mr. Gautreau for one-half of the payments and expenses he made on the community-owned pickup truck that he used exclusively after the separation.
- Elizabeth Gautreau, as defendant-appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a spouse who has exclusive use of a community-owned vehicle after the termination of the community entitled to reimbursement from the other spouse for one-half of the payments, maintenance, and insurance expenses incurred during that period of exclusive use?
Opinions:
Majority - Woodard, J.
No. A spouse who has exclusive use of a community vehicle after the community's termination is not entitled to reimbursement for expenses related to that vehicle. The court found that it would be inequitable to allow one spouse the exclusive use and enjoyment of a community automobile, which depreciates with use, while requiring the other spouse to reimburse half of the payments and maintenance costs. Citing precedent from other Louisiana appellate courts in Gachez v. Gachez and Davezac v. Davezac, the court reasoned that because the use of a vehicle is directly related to its depreciation, the spouse who benefits from its exclusive use should bear the associated costs. Therefore, the trial court erred in ordering Ms. Gautreau to reimburse Mr. Gautreau for these expenses. In a footnote, the author expressed personal disagreement with this 'automobile exception' to the general reimbursement rule of Civil Code Article 2365, but felt bound by the circuit's prevailing jurisprudence.
Concurring - Yelverton, J.
The opinion text indicates that Judge Yelverton concurs without providing a separate written opinion.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies an equitable 'automobile exception' to the general Louisiana rule allowing a spouse to be reimbursed for using separate funds to pay a community debt after the termination of the community. By treating a depreciating asset like a vehicle differently from non-depreciating assets, the court prioritizes fairness over a strict application of the reimbursement statute. The ruling highlights a circuit split within Louisiana, as noted in the opinion, creating uncertainty for practitioners and signaling a potential issue for the Louisiana Supreme Court to resolve. This precedent directs that in future partitions, the spouse with exclusive use of a community vehicle will be solely responsible for its associated costs post-separation.
