Gary James Joslin v. United States
1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15392, 666 F.2d 1306, 49 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 379 (1981)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When a taxpayer receives property, including coins with a numismatic value exceeding their face value, as compensation for services, the taxpayer must report the fair market value of the property as gross income for tax purposes.
Facts:
- Gary James Joslin, an attorney, agreed to provide legal services to a client in exchange for payment in silver dollars.
- Joslin rendered 20 hours of legal services.
- His client paid him with 200 silver dollars.
- Joslin's standard billing rate was 50 Federal Reserve notes per hour, making the services worth $1,000.
- At the time of payment, each silver dollar had a numismatic (market) value equivalent to five Federal Reserve notes, making the 200 coins worth $1,000.
Procedural Posture:
- Gary James Joslin reported $200 as income from the transaction on his federal income tax return.
- The IRS assessed a tax deficiency against Joslin, calculating his income from the transaction as $1,000.
- Joslin paid the tax deficiency.
- Joslin (plaintiff) filed a suit for a tax refund against the government in United States District Court.
- Following a hearing, a U.S. Magistrate recommended that the suit be dismissed.
- The district court adopted the magistrate's recommendation and dismissed the suit with prejudice.
- Joslin (appellant) appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
For income tax purposes, is a taxpayer who receives silver dollars as compensation for services required to report the income at the coins' fair market value, even if that value is higher than their face value?
Opinions:
Majority - Per Curiam
Yes, a taxpayer must report the fair market value of silver dollars received as income, not their face value. Under I.R.C. § 61(a)(1), gross income includes compensation for services, and Treasury Regulation § 1.61-2(d)(1) specifies that if compensation is paid in property, the income is measured by the property's fair market value. The court reasoned that a silver dollar possesses characteristics of both cash (face value) and property (numismatic value). When a taxpayer, like Joslin, specifically bargains for and benefits from the higher market value of the coins, that higher value must be included in income. The fact that the coins are also legal tender with a nominal face value does not change this outcome, as Joslin clearly received an economic benefit equivalent to the coins' market value, not their face value.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the principle that the economic substance of a transaction, rather than its form, governs tax liability. It prevents the use of legal tender with a high numismatic value as a tax loophole to underreport income. The ruling clarifies that when currency is treated as a commodity or collectible due to its market value exceeding its face value, tax law will treat it as property subject to fair market valuation. This precedent is significant for any transaction involving compensation in-kind, especially with collectibles, precious metals, or cryptocurrencies that have a fluctuating market value distinct from any assigned nominal value.
