Fuchser v. Jacobson
290 N.W.2d 449, 1980 Neb. LEXIS 791, 205 Neb. 786 (1980)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under common law and Nebraska statutes, an owner has an absolute duty to restrain their domestic animals and is liable for damages caused by their trespass on another's 'cultivated lands' or for the failure to restrain specific male animals like bulls. The measure of damages for a purebred breeding animal impregnated by a trespassing animal is the difference in the purebred animal's market value immediately before and immediately after the unwanted impregnation.
Facts:
- The plaintiff, a breeder of purebred Hereford cattle, maintained his cows in a fenced pasture planted with crested wheat grass.
- The plaintiff's pasture adjoined land owned by the defendant, and the defendant was obligated to maintain part of the fence separating the properties.
- In May 1977, the plaintiff discovered the defendant's purebred Angus bull in the plaintiff's pasture, interacting with one of the plaintiff’s purebred Hereford cows that was in heat.
- Following a normal gestation period, the plaintiff's Hereford cow gave birth to a white-faced black calf, which could only be the result of crossbreeding with an Angus bull.
- The defendant conceded that his portion of the fence was in disrepair, needed repair, and was insufficient to restrain a bull, and that the plaintiff had previously brought its state of disrepair to his attention.
- The defendant's bulls were usually kept in a location further removed from the plaintiff's pasture, secured by an electrified 'hot wire' fence that frequently failed due to shorting out.
Procedural Posture:
- The plaintiff initiated an action for damages against the defendant in the Small Claims Court of Sheridan County.
- The Small Claims Court found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded $300.
- The defendant appealed the Small Claims Court's decision to the District Court for Sheridan County, Nebraska, where the case was tried de novo.
- The District Court found in favor of the plaintiff and awarded $400.
- The defendant appealed the District Court's judgment to the Nebraska Supreme Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an owner of a purebred Angus bull have an absolute duty under common law and Nebraska statutes to restrain the animal, thereby incurring liability for damages when the bull trespasses onto a purebred Hereford breeder's 'cultivated land' and impregnates a purebred Hereford cow, and is the proper measure of damages the reduction in value of the cow as a purebred breeding animal?
Opinions:
Majority - Clark, District Judge
Yes, an owner of a purebred Angus bull has an absolute duty to restrain the animal, thereby incurring liability for damages when the bull trespasses onto a purebred Hereford breeder's cultivated land and impregnates a purebred Hereford cow, and the proper measure of damages is the reduction in value of the cow as a purebred breeding animal. At common law, an owner has an absolute duty to keep domestic animals restrained and is liable for their trespasses, regardless of negligence. Nebraska statutes modify this only by restricting liability to 'cultivated lands,' but the court clarified that 'cultivated lands' includes fenced or enclosed farm/pasture land like the plaintiff's, not solely land surrounded by a plowed strip as the defendant argued. Furthermore, Nebraska statutes specifically mandate that bull owners restrain their animals and are liable for failure to do so, a duty not restricted to cultivated lands. The defendant's failure to maintain his fence and the known malfunction of his 'hot wire' also constituted evidence of negligence. The court rejected arguments of contributory negligence or assumption of risk, stating the plaintiff had the right to use his pasture without needing to erect a fence strong enough to deter trespassing bulls. Regarding damages, the proper measure is the difference between the cow’s value as a purebred Hereford for breeding immediately before and immediately after impregnation by the defendant’s bull. The fact that the defendant’s bull was also purebred (Angus) is immaterial, as the crossbred offspring reduces the Hereford cow's value in the purebred market. The trial court's findings on both liability and damages were well-supported by the evidence and were not clearly wrong.
Concurring - Hastings, J.
Hastings, J., concurs in the result.
Analysis:
This case affirms the strict liability principle for animal trespass in Nebraska, clarifying that 'cultivated lands' includes common fenced pastures, thereby broadening the scope of statutory liability. It also underscores the absolute duty of animal owners, particularly those with bulls, to maintain adequate restraints, placing the burden squarely on the animal owner rather than the landowner whose property is trespassed upon. Furthermore, the decision establishes a clear and specific measure of damages for genetic contamination of purebred breeding stock, which is crucial for breeders protecting their valuable animals. The ruling ensures that landowners are not required to anticipate and prevent trespasses from their neighbors' unrestrained animals.
