Fruehauf Corp. v. United States
25 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,426, 587 F.2d 486, 218 Ct. Cl. 456 (1978)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under a government contract's Suspension of Work clause, a contractor is entitled to an equitable adjustment for costs resulting from an unreasonable delay caused by the government or its other contractors, even if the government is not at fault for the delay. A protracted delay, not attributable to the contractor, constitutes a constructive suspension of work for the government's convenience.
Facts:
- On June 29, 1964, Fruehauf Corporation contracted with the U.S. Post Office Department (POD) to furnish and install a mechanical mail handling system in a new post office building to be constructed in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
- The contract stated an expected completion date of August 1, 1965, contingent on the timely completion of the building by a separate contractor, Beacon Construction Company, and its subcontractor, AMECO.
- By the fall of 1964, it became apparent that foundation problems at the site would significantly delay the building's construction.
- In April 1965, the POD advised Fruehauf of a new tentative completion date of October 15, 1966, representing a delay of over a year. In response, Fruehauf requested a formal suspension of installation.
- On February 24, 1966, Fruehauf was finally given a site access date of May 2, 1966, providing an extremely short mobilization period.
- Upon gaining access to the site, Fruehauf encountered exceptionally poor conditions and numerous building deficiencies caused by AMECO, including debris, lack of utilities, flooding, misaligned ceiling inserts, and interfering fixtures.
- These conditions and interferences, which persisted from May through November 1966, caused a 25 percent loss of efficiency for Fruehauf's work.
- Fruehauf ultimately completed its installation and testing on December 16, 1966, approximately 15 months after the originally scheduled completion date.
Procedural Posture:
- Fruehauf Corporation submitted claims for an equitable adjustment to the contracting officer of the U.S. Post Office Department.
- The contracting officer denied the claims, and Fruehauf appealed the decision to the U.S. Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals (PSBCA).
- The PSBCA, in a de novo proceeding, denied Fruehauf's appeal and also denied a counterclaim asserted by the Government.
- Fruehauf (plaintiff) sought judicial review of the PSBCA's decision in the U.S. Court of Claims.
- In the Court of Claims, Fruehauf filed a motion for summary judgment, and the Government (defendant) filed a cross-motion for summary judgment.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a government contractor have a right to an equitable adjustment under a Suspension of Work clause for unreasonable delays and resulting costs caused by another of the government's contractors, even when the government itself was not at fault or negligent?
Opinions:
Majority - Fletcher, Trial Judge (adopted Per Curiam)
Yes. A government contractor is entitled to an equitable adjustment under the Suspension of Work clause for an unreasonable delay caused by another government contractor, regardless of whether the government was at fault. The Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals erred as a matter of law by requiring Fruehauf to prove government fault. The court distinguished this case, which involves a Suspension of Work clause, from prior breach of contract cases like Ben C. Gerwick, Inc. v. United States that did require a showing of government fault. Citing Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United States, the court reasoned that the clause can be invoked when a delay, not caused by the contractor, is so protracted that the contractor cannot reasonably be expected to bear the costs, even if the government was not negligent. The 15-month delay in site availability was unreasonable, and Fruehauf was not at fault. Therefore, the situation amounted to a constructive suspension for the government's convenience, and the financial risk must be allocated between the innocent parties through an equitable adjustment.
Analysis:
This decision significantly clarifies the scope of the Suspension of Work clause in government contracts, particularly in multi-contractor projects. It firmly establishes that government fault is not a prerequisite for a contractor to obtain an equitable adjustment for unreasonable delays. The ruling strengthens contractor protections by shifting the focus from the government's negligence to the reasonableness of the delay and its impact on the contractor. This precedent allocates the risk of delay caused by one government contractor to the government, rather than to another innocent contractor on the same project, reinforcing the principle of constructive suspension based on government inaction.
Unlock the full brief for Fruehauf Corp. v. United States