French v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
1995 WL 141382, 896 S.W.2d 795 (1995)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When a deed grants a fractional mineral estate in one clause but a subsequent clause states the conveyance is a 'royalty interest only,' the instrument is interpreted to convey a mineral interest with the grantor reserving all rights except the right to receive royalty payments, resulting in the grantee receiving a fraction of the royalty, not a fixed fraction of total production.
Facts:
- In 1943, George Calvert, who owned a 1/32 mineral interest in a 32,808.5-acre tract, executed a 'Mineral Deed' to Capton M. Paul.
- The first paragraph of the deed granted Paul an 'undivided Fifty (50) acre interest, being an undivided 1/656.17th interest in and to all of the oil, gas and other minerals, in, under and that may be produced' from the land.
- The second paragraph of the deed stated, 'It is understood and agreed that this conveyance is a royalty interest only.'
- This second paragraph also explicitly reserved to the grantor all rights to delay rentals, leasing revenues, and any control over leasing the land.
- Fuller Trust later became the successor-in-interest to the grantee, Capton M. Paul.
- Chevron and other parties became the successors-in-interest to the grantor, George Calvert.
- A dispute arose between Fuller Trust and Calvert's successors regarding the size of the interest conveyed by the 1943 deed.
Procedural Posture:
- Fuller Trust, as the grantee's successor, brought a declaratory judgment action against Calvert's successors, including Chevron, in a Texas trial court to construe the deed.
- Both parties filed motions for summary judgment, asserting the deed was unambiguous.
- The trial court denied Fuller Trust's motion and granted Chevron's motion, holding that the deed conveyed a mineral interest with a reservation of certain rights.
- Fuller Trust, as appellant, appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment.
- Fuller Trust then filed an Application for Writ of Error to the Supreme Court of Texas.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a mineral deed that grants a fractional interest 'in and to all of the oil, gas and other minerals' but subsequently states the conveyance 'is a royalty interest only' convey a fixed royalty of that fraction of total production, or does it convey a fractional mineral interest entitled only to that fraction of the negotiated royalty?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Enoch
No, the deed conveys a fractional mineral interest entitled to a fraction of the negotiated royalty, not a fixed royalty of total production. The court's primary duty is to ascertain the intent of the parties by looking at the entire instrument under the 'four corners' rule. While the first paragraph appears to grant a 1/656.17 mineral estate, the second paragraph clarifies it is a 'royalty interest only' and reserves all other attributes of a mineral estate (right to lease, receive bonuses, receive delay rentals) to the grantor. The court reasoned that if the parties intended to convey a fixed 1/656.17 royalty of total production, the specific reservations in the second paragraph would be redundant, as a pure royalty interest holder never possesses those rights. To harmonize all parts of the deed and give them meaning, the court concluded that the deed conveyed a 1/656.17 mineral interest that was stripped of all appurtenant rights except the right to receive its fractional share of royalty payments.
Analysis:
This case establishes a key interpretive rule for resolving common conflicts within Texas mineral deeds. It reinforces the 'four corners' doctrine and the canon of construction requiring courts to harmonize all provisions of an instrument rather than allowing one clause to render another meaningless. The decision provides crucial clarity on the distinction between a 'fractional royalty' (a share of total production) and a 'fraction of royalty' (a share of the landowner's negotiated royalty), which has significant financial implications. This precedent guides courts and practitioners in interpreting older, ambiguously drafted deeds and influences how future mineral conveyances are drafted to avoid such disputes.
Unlock the full brief for French v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.