Fred Brosnahan v. Western Air Lines, Inc., and Delta Airlines, Inc.
892 F.2d 730, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 19402 (1989)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An airline's negligent failure to supervise the passenger boarding process can be the proximate cause of an injury, even when the immediate harm is inflicted by another passenger's carelessness, if the third party's act is a foreseeable consequence of the airline's breach of its ongoing duty of care.
Facts:
- On March 20, 1986, Fred Brosnahan was a passenger on a nearly full Western Air Lines flight.
- The boarding process was disorderly, causing bottlenecks in the aisles.
- After Brosnahan was seated, another passenger struggled for 30 to 60 seconds to stow a heavy leather garment bag in the overhead compartment directly above Brosnahan.
- While struggling, the passenger dropped the bag on Brosnahan’s head, causing permanent head injuries.
- Western Air Lines' own flight attendant manual required an attendant to be positioned in the coach cabin to assist passengers with stowing carry-on items.
- No flight attendant was present at the required station to supervise or offer assistance during this incident.
Procedural Posture:
- Fred Brosnahan sued Western Air Lines for negligence in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota (trial court).
- Following a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Brosnahan, awarding him $74,600 in damages.
- Western Air Lines filed a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV).
- The district court granted the motion, setting aside the jury's verdict on the grounds that Brosnahan had failed to prove the airline's negligence was the proximate cause of his injury.
- Brosnahan (appellant) appealed the district court's granting of the JNOV to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an airline's negligent failure to supervise the boarding process and assist passengers with carry-on luggage constitute the proximate cause of an injury sustained by one passenger when another passenger drops a bag on them?
Opinions:
Majority - McMillian, J.
Yes. An airline's negligent failure to supervise the boarding process can be the proximate cause of a passenger's injury. The district court erred in applying the 'condition versus cause' distinction because the airline's duty to supervise is not a static condition; it is a continuous duty that remains in operation throughout the boarding process. The passenger's carelessness was not an independent, superseding cause because the airline had a direct duty to supervise that exact type of conduct to ensure passenger safety. Because a reasonable jury could find that the presence and intervention of a flight attendant was a substantial factor that could have prevented the foreseeable injury, the question of causation was a matter for the jury to decide, not for the judge to overturn as a matter of law.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the limit of the 'condition versus cause' defense in negligence law, particularly for common carriers with a heightened duty of care. It establishes that when a defendant has an ongoing duty to supervise and prevent a specific type of harm, the intervening negligent act of a third party does not automatically break the chain of proximate causation if that act was a foreseeable result of the defendant's failure to supervise. This holding reinforces that entities with supervisory duties cannot easily escape liability by blaming the direct actor when their own negligence created the opportunity for the harm to occur. The case underscores that questions of foreseeability and causation are typically reserved for the jury, especially when reasonable minds could differ.
Unlock the full brief for Fred Brosnahan v. Western Air Lines, Inc., and Delta Airlines, Inc.