Fitzgerald v. National Rifle Ass'n of America
1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6646, 383 F. Supp. 162 (1974)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A publisher's general right to refuse advertisements is not absolute and must yield to the fiduciary duty of corporate directors to ensure fair corporate elections, particularly when the publication is an internal corporate journal integral to the election process and the only viable means for a candidate to reach the voting membership.
Facts:
- The National Rifle Association (NRA) is a non-profit corporation organized under New York law.
- The American Rifleman is the official journal of the NRA, available only to members and funded by membership dues and advertising.
- Plaintiff Fitzgerald became a 'life member' of the NRA, which made him eligible to be elected to the 75-member Board of Directors.
- The American Rifleman is an integral part of the NRA's election process, as it is used to publish the official list of candidates selected by the nominating committee.
- To promote his candidacy for the Board, Fitzgerald submitted a paid advertisement to The American Rifleman.
- The NRA refused to publish Fitzgerald's advertisement, citing a reserved right on its advertising rate card to reject any ad.
- The NRA had also previously refused to provide Fitzgerald with a list of NRA members, which would have provided an alternative way to reach voters.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiffs Fitzgerald, Abelman, and NRA Members for a Better NRA filed a petition in the U.S. District Court, a court of first instance.
- The petition sought a court order requiring the defendant, the National Rifle Association of America (NRA), to publish an advertisement in its official journal, The American Rifleman.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a non-profit corporation's official journal, which is integral to its election process, have an absolute right under the First Amendment to refuse a paid advertisement from a member running for its board of directors, when that refusal effectively prevents the candidate from communicating with the voting membership?
Opinions:
Majority - Whipple, Chief Judge
No. A publisher's right to refuse advertisements is not absolute and must yield when its exercise curtails a right of greater social importance, such as the fiduciary duty of corporate directors to ensure fair and open corporate elections. The court reasoned that The American Rifleman is not a typical commercial publication but is more akin to a corporate newsletter, funded by members and integral to the NRA's election process. As such, the NRA's directors owe a fiduciary duty to the members, which includes not using corporate instrumentalities like the journal to perpetuate themselves in office. By denying both the membership list and access to the journal, the NRA management created a situation where Fitzgerald had no way to communicate with the electorate, raising the 'spectre of management bad faith.' The court rejected the NRA's First Amendment defense, stating that the right of a free press is not absolute and cannot be used as a pretext for denying stockholders their right to participate in corporate affairs or for shirking legal obligations like fiduciary duties.
Analysis:
This decision establishes a significant exception to the general principle that a private publisher has broad discretion to accept or reject advertising. It holds that for internal corporate publications that are central to the organization's democratic process, the publisher's discretion is limited by the fiduciary duties of the organization's leadership to its members. The ruling differentiates between a general circulation newspaper and a members-only corporate journal, making the latter subject to equitable duties of fairness during elections. This precedent will likely influence future cases involving internal publications of other member-based organizations, such as unions or cooperatives, where access to the publication is crucial for dissident candidates.
