First National Bank in Munday v. Lubbock Feeders, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas
2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 233, 2006 WL 60812, 183 S.W.3d 875 (2006)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A lender obtains a priority purchase money security interest (PMSI) in livestock even if loan funds are advanced after the debtor purchases the collateral, so long as the loan is 'closely allied' with the purchase. Furthermore, the UCC requirement to notify a prior secured creditor of a PMSI in livestock is not triggered if the debtor never receives physical possession of the livestock.


Facts:

  • First National Bank in Munday (the Bank) had a security interest in all livestock owned by John William Cox, including any acquired in the future.
  • Cox entered into an agreement with Lubbock Feeders, L.P., for a 'cattle and feed financed option,' where Lubbock Feeders would finance Cox's purchase of cattle to be raised at its feedlot.
  • As part of the agreement, Cox granted Lubbock Feeders a security interest in the cattle being purchased.
  • Cox purchased cattle from third-party vendors at various sale barn auctions.
  • All purchased cattle were delivered directly from the auctions to Lubbock Feeders' commercial feed yard.
  • Cox never took physical possession of the cattle.
  • After a set of cattle arrived at the feed yard, Lubbock Feeders would advance loan funds to Cox, enabling him to complete the purchase from the third-party vendor.
  • This process was repeated for several different lots of cattle, with each loan advance from Lubbock Feeders corresponding to a specific set of cattle.

Procedural Posture:

  • First National Bank in Munday sued John William Cox in a Texas trial court to collect on defaulted notes.
  • Lubbock Feeders, L.P. intervened in the lawsuit, claiming a superior security interest in Cox's cattle that were located at its feedlot.
  • Both the Bank and Lubbock Feeders filed motions for summary judgment, each arguing its security interest had priority.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Lubbock Feeders, holding it had a superior purchase money security interest.
  • The trial court then severed the claims between the Bank and Lubbock Feeders, which made the summary judgment a final, appealable order.
  • The Bank (appellant) appealed the trial court's judgment to the Court of Appeals of Texas (appellee is Lubbock Feeders).

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a lender obtain a priority purchase money security interest in livestock when it loans money to a debtor after the debtor has purchased the cattle, the lender takes and maintains possession of the cattle, and the lender does not notify a prior secured party of its interest?


Opinions:

Majority - Justice Terry McCall

Yes, a lender obtains a priority purchase money security interest under these circumstances. The court reasoned that a loan creates a purchase money security interest (PMSI) if the value given enables the debtor to acquire rights in the collateral, and the value is in fact so used. The timing of the loan disbursement is not determinative; rather, the key consideration is whether the loan is 'closely allied' with the purchase. Here, since each loan advance related to a specific set of cattle and was made shortly after Cox's purchase, the loans were closely allied and enabled him to acquire the cattle. The court further held that Lubbock Feeders perfected its security interest by taking possession of the cattle, which is a valid method of perfection under the UCC. Finally, the court determined that the UCC's notice requirement for a PMSI in livestock to have priority over a conflicting security interest (UCC § 9.324(d)) is only triggered when the 'debtor receives possession of the livestock.' Because Cox never had physical possession of the cattle, the notice requirement was not triggered, and Lubbock Feeders was not required to notify the Bank to achieve priority status for its perfected PMSI.



Analysis:

This decision clarifies two significant aspects of purchase money security interests (PMSIs) in livestock. First, it adopts the 'closely allied' standard for determining if a loan is for purchase money, providing lenders flexibility by confirming that a loan can qualify even if disbursed after the debtor technically acquires the collateral. Second, it establishes a bright-line rule that the UCC's notice requirement for PMSI priority is strictly tied to the debtor's physical possession. This ruling provides a significant advantage and legal certainty for lenders like feedlots who maintain continuous possession of the collateral, as it relieves them of the burden of notifying prior creditors to secure their priority lien.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query First National Bank in Munday v. Lubbock Feeders, L.P. (2006) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.