FIRST NAT. BANK OF ABBEVILLE v. Greene
612 So. 2d 759, 1992 WL 382090, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 4039 (1992)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The renewal of a loan note in the name of a new obligor does not constitute a novation that extinguishes the original debt or its security, unless there is clear evidence of the creditor's intent to release the original debtor. A pledge securing a debt remains effective through subsequent renewals of that debt without the need for a formal repledge, as long as the collateral remains in the creditor's possession.
Facts:
- In 1984, Ruby LeBlanc and Delores Dietz agreed to place in rem collateral mortgages on their property to secure loans from First National Bank of Abbeville to Hardy Tractor of Gueydon, Inc., totaling $120,000.
- Dietz, an out-of-state resident, executed powers of attorney authorizing LeBlanc to create the mortgages on her behalf for the specific purpose of securing the loans to Hardy Tractor.
- Hardy Tractor, through its president, signed collateral pledge agreements and delivered the two collateral mortgage notes to the Bank, where they remained in the Bank's possession.
- In 1985, Donald Greene, a director of Hardy Tractor, co-signed a renewal note for the loan and also signed a continuing personal guaranty for the corporate debt.
- In 1986, Hardy Tractor became defunct, and its directors, including Greene, agreed to personally divide and assume the company's debts, with Greene assuming the debt owed to the Bank.
- In 1987, the Bank accepted a new hand note signed solely by Donald Greene for the remaining balance of the original Hardy Tractor loan.
- In 1988, the Bank made a final renewal of the loan through a note signed by Donald Greene, which explicitly stated it was secured by the two original 1984 collateral mortgage notes.
- Donald Greene became delinquent in his payments on the 1988 hand note.
Procedural Posture:
- First National Bank of Abbeville filed suit in a Louisiana trial court against Donald Greene, Delores Dietz, and Ruby LeBlanc.
- Defendants Dietz and LeBlanc filed an exception of no cause of action, which the trial court denied.
- Following a trial at which Dietz and LeBlanc failed to appear, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the Bank against Greene for the debt and recognized the collateral mortgages on Dietz and LeBlanc's property.
- The trial court denied a motion for a new trial filed by Dietz and LeBlanc.
- Dietz and LeBlanc, as defendants-appellants, appealed the judgment to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the renewal of a corporate loan under the name of a director who personally assumed the debt constitute a novation that extinguishes the original debt and a third-party's collateral mortgage pledge, when there is no evidence that the creditor intended to release the original debtor or the security?
Opinions:
Majority - Stoker, J.
No. The renewal of the loan under Donald Greene's name was not a novation because the facts and circumstances do not evidence an intent by the creditor to release the original debtor, Hardy Tractor. The original pledge of the collateral mortgage notes remained effective to secure the renewed debt. The principles of novation require a clear intent by the creditor to extinguish an existing obligation by substituting a new one in its place. Here, there is no evidence the Bank intended to release Hardy Tractor; it merely permitted Greene, one of the debt's guarantors, to assume responsibility for payment. It is unreasonable to believe the Bank would intentionally substitute a secured debt for an unsecured one. Furthermore, the original pledge was valid because although Hardy Tractor signed the pledge agreement, the property owners, Dietz and LeBlanc, gave their clear consent by executing the mortgages for the express purpose of securing the debt. Under Louisiana Civil Code article 3158, a pledge remains effective to secure renewals of the original loan without any new formality, provided the collateral remains with the creditor. Since there was no novation, Greene's note was merely a renewal of the original Hardy Tractor debt, and the original pledge continued to secure it.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the high evidentiary standard required to prove novation, emphasizing that a creditor's intent to release the original obligor will not be presumed. It clarifies that ministerial changes, such as renewing a loan under the name of a guarantor who has assumed the debt, do not automatically extinguish the underlying obligation or its security. The ruling provides stability for lenders by ensuring that collateral pledges are not easily defeated by routine loan renewals. It affirms the principle that as long as the underlying debt continues, so does the pledge securing it, protecting creditors from inadvertently losing their security through subsequent modifications to the loan agreement.
