Fields v. Michael
91 Cal. App. 2d 443, 1949 Cal. App. LEXIS 1247, 205 P.2d 402 (1949)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A surviving spouse whose community property rights were violated by unauthorized inter vivos gifts made by the deceased spouse may sue the deceased spouse's estate to recover her one-half interest in those gifts. This action is permissible because the managing spouse's unauthorized gifts constitute a breach of fiduciary duty and a "waste" of community property, creating a personal liability that survives his death.
Facts:
- Plaintiff married W. C. Fields (decedent) on April 8, 1900.
- At the time of the marriage, Fields had no assets, and all property he later acquired was community property from his personal earnings.
- Several years after their marriage, Fields deserted the plaintiff.
- During the marriage, Fields secretly made gifts of community property totaling at least $482,450 to various individuals without his wife's knowledge or consent.
- Fields willfully concealed all information about his finances and the gifts from his wife.
- The plaintiff did not learn of these gifts until after Fields died on December 25, 1946.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiff filed a 'Creditor's Claim and Disaffirmance' for $241,225 with the executrix of her deceased husband's estate.
- The defendant executrix rejected the claim.
- Plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant executrix in the superior court (trial court).
- Defendant demurred to the complaint, arguing it failed to state a cause of action.
- The trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend and entered a judgment in favor of the defendant.
- Plaintiff appealed the judgment to the District Court of Appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a surviving wife have a cause of action against her deceased husband's estate to recover her one-half interest in community property that the husband fraudulently and secretly gifted to third parties without her knowledge or consent?
Opinions:
Majority - Shinn, P. J.
Yes, a surviving wife has a cause of action against her deceased husband's estate to recover her share of unauthorized gifts. The husband, as manager of the community estate, occupies a position analogous to that of a fiduciary or trustee for his wife. His unauthorized gifts of community property violate state statute (Civil Code § 172) and constitute a breach of this fiduciary duty, which is a form of fraud against the wife. This dissipation of assets qualifies as a 'waste' or 'conversion' of the wife's property under Probate Code § 574, allowing his estate to be sued. A beneficiary of a trust is not required to pursue the dissipated property from the donees but may elect to hold the trustee's estate personally liable, especially when, as alleged here, recourse against the donees would be ineffective. To deny this remedy would render the law 'toothless' in protecting the wife's community property interest.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the managing spouse's role as a fiduciary with respect to community property and establishes that a breach of this duty creates personal liability that survives death. It provides the non-consenting spouse a powerful alternative remedy, allowing them to make a single, consolidated claim against the deceased spouse's estate rather than pursuing multiple, potentially ineffective lawsuits against individual donees. This significantly strengthens the legal protections for a non-managing spouse's community property interest by ensuring an effective recourse against fraudulent dissipation of assets.
