Fan v. StoneMor Partners LP
927 F.3d 710 (2019)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
In a securities fraud case, a defendant's sufficient and clear disclosure of financial information and business risks in public filings can render its allegedly optimistic or misleading public statements immaterial.
Facts:
- StoneMor Partners L.P. is a funeral services company that generates revenue from 'pre-need sales' for products and services purchased before a customer's death.
- State law required StoneMor to hold a percentage of the proceeds from these pre-need sales in trust, making the cash unavailable until the customer's death.
- This created a disparity between StoneMor's reported sales and its available cash, which was needed to make quarterly distributions to its investors (unitholders).
- To fund these distributions, StoneMor engaged in a financial cycle: it borrowed money from a credit facility to pay distributions, sold new equity units to the public, and used the proceeds from those sales to pay down the debt.
- Alongside standard GAAP accounting, StoneMor issued non-GAAP financial reports that represented pre-need sales as part of its current revenue.
- On September 2, 2016, StoneMor announced it had to restate three years of financial statements, which under regulations, temporarily prevented it from selling new units.
- Lacking proceeds from equity sales to fund its financial cycle, StoneMor announced on October 27, 2016, that it was cutting its unit distribution by nearly half.
- Following the announcement of the distribution cut, the price of StoneMor's units dropped by 45%.
Procedural Posture:
- Peter Fan and other investors (Plaintiffs) filed a class-action lawsuit against StoneMor Partners L.P. and its executives (Defendants) in U.S. District Court.
- The complaint alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.
- Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and for failure to meet the PSLRA's heightened pleading standards.
- The District Court granted the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint.
- The Plaintiffs (Appellants) appealed the dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a company's public statements about its financial health and sources of investor distributions constitute securities fraud under Rule 10b-5 when the company also discloses detailed information in its official filings that clarifies its financial structure and inherent business risks?
Opinions:
Majority - Restrepo, Circuit Judge.
No. A company's statements do not amount to securities fraud if, when viewed in the context of all publicly available information, they are not materially misleading to a reasonable investor. Here, StoneMor's extensive and consistent disclosures in its official filings rendered the allegedly misleading statements immaterial. The court reasoned that a reasonable investor would not have been misled because StoneMor's Form 10-K filings and other reports clearly explained its financial model and the associated risks. Specifically, StoneMor disclosed that its 'Available Cash' for distributions included borrowed funds, warned that cash from operations might be insufficient to maintain distributions, and explicitly stated that proceeds from equity offerings were used to pay down its credit facility. By presenting GAAP and non-GAAP financials side-by-side, StoneMor also made clear that distributions were not funded solely by day-to-day operating revenue. Furthermore, the plaintiffs failed to plead facts creating a 'strong inference' of scienter (intent to defraud), as the company's transparency about its risky but legal business strategy was more compelling than any inference of fraudulent intent.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the importance of the 'total mix of information' standard in securities fraud litigation, emphasizing that courts will not view allegedly misleading statements in isolation. It provides a strong defense for companies that, despite making optimistic public statements, maintain comprehensive and accurate disclosures in their SEC filings. The ruling underscores the high pleading standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA), making it difficult for plaintiffs to succeed if a company has been transparent about its financial mechanisms and business risks, even if those risks ultimately lead to investor losses.
Unlock the full brief for Fan v. StoneMor Partners LP