Everritt v. Georgia
588 S.E.2d 691 (2003)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A conspirator is not criminally responsible for a collateral crime committed by a co-conspirator unless that crime was a reasonably foreseeable, natural, and probable consequence of the original unlawful agreement.
Facts:
- Raymond F. Everritt, facing financial problems, hired John Henry McDuffie to burn down his insured service station for a payment of $5,000 from the insurance proceeds.
- In June 1992, McDuffie and his grandson, James Wallace Weeks, unsuccessfully attempted to burn down the station.
- Two weeks later, McDuffie recruited Roosevelt Cox, promising him $1,500, and they successfully burned down the station.
- When Everritt's insurance company delayed payment, Cox, who had not been paid, began telling others that Everritt owed him money for the arson.
- In September 1992, McDuffie, concerned that Cox would not remain silent, lured Cox into his shop and killed him with an axe.
- After the murder, Everritt gave McDuffie a new set of tires to help conceal that McDuffie's truck had been used to transport Cox's body.
- Everritt later warned Weeks to keep his mouth shut about the events.
- In March 1993, Everritt's insurance claim was settled for $123,065.
Procedural Posture:
- Raymond F. Everritt, John Henry McDuffie, and James Wallace Weeks were indicted for the murder of Roosevelt Cox.
- In the trial court, Everritt was tried for malice murder, while Weeks testified against him as part of a plea agreement.
- Everritt made a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal, which the trial court denied.
- The jury found Everritt guilty of murder, and the trial court sentenced him to life in prison.
- Everritt's motion for a new trial was denied by the trial court.
- Everritt (appellant) appealed the conviction to the Supreme Court of Georgia, arguing the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Can one who enters a conspiracy to commit arson be held criminally responsible for the murder of a co-conspirator by another, when the murder was committed months after the arson for the purpose of concealing the conspiracy?
Opinions:
Majority - Thompson, Justice
No. A person who conspires to commit arson cannot be held criminally responsible for the murder of a co-conspirator by another, because the murder was not a reasonably foreseeable, natural, and probable consequence of the original arson conspiracy. The court found sufficient evidence to prove Everritt conspired to commit arson with McDuffie and Cox. However, a conspirator's liability for collateral acts committed by a co-conspirator only extends to those acts that are a 'natural and probable consequence' of the original agreement. The central question is one of 'reasonable foreseeability,' not mere necessity. While killing Cox may have been seen as necessary by McDuffie to conceal the arson, a conspiracy to commit a property crime like arson does not, without more, make a subsequent murder a reasonably foreseeable outcome. To hold otherwise would raise serious due process concerns by holding a person accountable for crimes they were unaware of and did not influence.
Analysis:
This decision significantly clarifies the limits of co-conspirator liability, often referred to as the Pinkerton doctrine, in Georgia. The court establishes that foreseeability is the key factor in determining responsibility for collateral crimes, drawing a sharp line between the original conspiracy and subsequent, distinct offenses. The ruling prevents the doctrine of vicarious liability from being over-extended to hold individuals accountable for unforeseeable acts of violence that are too attenuated from the initial criminal plan. Future cases involving conspiracy will now require a more direct and foreseeable link between the agreed-upon crime and any subsequent offenses committed by a co-conspirator.
Unlock the full brief for Everritt v. Georgia