Estate of Berkman v. Commissioner
38 T.C.M. 183, 1979 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 482, 1979 T.C. Memo. 46 (1979)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
When property is transferred within a family for a long-term, unsecured promissory note carrying a below-market interest rate, the transfer constitutes a taxable gift to the extent that the value of the property transferred exceeds the fair market value of the note received.
Facts:
- Between November 1968 and March 1972, Meyer B. Berkman, who was over 75 years old, transferred a total of $275,000 to his daughter Barbara Given, his son-in-law Kenneth Given, and their wholly-owned company, Given Paint Manufacturing Company.
- In exchange for the cash transfers, Berkman received five separate promissory notes.
- Each note had a 20-year term, carried a 6% annual interest rate, and required monthly interest payments.
- The full principal amount of each note was due in a single balloon payment at the end of the 20-year term.
- None of the five promissory notes were secured by any collateral.
- For four of the five transfers, the 6% interest rate on the notes was at or below the prevailing prime interest rate for commercial bank loans.
- In 1969, after the first two transfers, Berkman suffered a stroke and subsequently lived with his daughter and son-in-law until his death in 1974.
- Berkman's will directed that his estate, which included these promissory notes, be divided equally between his two daughters, meaning Barbara Given would inherit half of the debt she and her husband owed.
Procedural Posture:
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined deficiencies in the federal gift taxes of Meyer B. Berkman for multiple years and in his estate's federal estate tax.
- The Estate of Meyer B. Berkman, as the petitioner, challenged the Commissioner's deficiency determinations by filing a petition with the United States Tax Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an intrafamily transfer of money in exchange for a long-term, unsecured promissory note with a below-market interest rate constitute a taxable gift to the extent the value of the money transferred exceeds the fair market value of the note?
Opinions:
Majority - Fay
Yes, an intrafamily transfer of money for a promissory note with below-market terms is a taxable gift equal to the difference between the cash transferred and the note's fair market value. The court first determined that the notes were valid, enforceable obligations because they were legally executed and interest was consistently paid, rejecting the Commissioner's claim that the entire transfer was a gift. However, the transactions did not qualify for the 'ordinary course of business' exception because they were not bona fide, at arm's length, and free from donative intent. The court identified several factors indicating donative intent: the advanced age of the lender (Berkman), the long 20-year maturity of the notes, the lack of security, the balloon payment structure, and the fact that the borrowers were the natural objects of his bounty. Because the transfers were not at arm's length, the consideration received (the notes) must be valued at their fair market value. A note's fair market value is less than its face amount when it carries a below-market interest rate, has a long maturity, and is unsecured. Therefore, for the four transfers where the note's 6% interest was below or near the higher prime rate, a taxable gift occurred. For the final transfer, where the note's 6% interest exceeded the 4.75% prime rate, the court found it was for adequate and full consideration and thus not a gift.
Analysis:
This case establishes that even if a transaction is structured as a loan with a valid, enforceable promissory note, it can still contain a taxable gift element if conducted between family members on non-commercial terms. It reinforces the principle that the substance of a transaction, rather than its form, governs tax consequences. The court's multi-factor analysis for determining whether a transaction is 'at arm's length' provides a framework for future cases involving intrafamily transfers. This decision pressures taxpayers to structure family loans with terms comparable to market standards (e.g., adequate interest, security, reasonable maturity) to avoid gift tax implications.
