Estate of Baer
81 Cal. App. 2d 830 (1947)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A spouse's testimony that they did not intend to make a gift of their interest in community property is sufficient evidence, if believed by the trial court, to rebut the statutory presumption that property acquired by a married woman via a written instrument in her name alone is her separate property.
Facts:
- Reginald W. Baer and Irene B. Baer married in 1936; at the time, Reginald had a substantial estate while Irene had very little.
- Between 1939 and 1941, Irene won approximately $5,800 from puzzle contests conducted by a newspaper.
- Irene deposited these winnings into separate bank accounts held in her name alone, over which her husband exercised no direct control.
- Beginning in 1941, funds from these accounts were used to purchase corporate stocks through a brokerage account also established in Irene's name.
- Although the stocks were held in Irene's name, Reginald managed the purchases and sales for the account.
- At the time of Irene's death in 1945, certificates for seven different stock issues were held in her name alone.
- Reginald stated that his purpose for having the securities in his wife's name was for convenience, so she could have immediate access to funds if he died before his will was probated.
Procedural Posture:
- Reginald W. Baer, as administrator of the estate of his deceased wife Irene B. Baer, filed his final account and petition for distribution in the probate court (trial court).
- Irene's parents (appellants) filed objections to the account, asserting that certain stocks were Irene's separate property.
- The trial court found that the disputed property was community property and entered a decree directing its distribution to the husband.
- The decedent's parents appealed the decree of the trial court to the California Court of Appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a husband's testimony that he intended stocks, purchased with community funds but held in his wife's name alone, to remain community property constitute substantial evidence sufficient to rebut the statutory presumption that such property is the wife's separate property?
Opinions:
Majority - White, J.
Yes. A husband's testimony that he did not intend to make a gift and intended property held in his wife's name to remain community property is sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that it is her separate property. The character of property as community or separate is a question of fact for the trial court, and its finding will not be disturbed on appeal if supported by substantial evidence. The presumption under Civil Code § 164 that property held in a wife's name is separate is rebuttable. Here, the husband's testimony that he managed the stock purchases, intended them to remain community property, and only titled them in his wife's name for probate avoidance purposes provided the necessary substantial evidence. The source of the funds—the wife's puzzle winnings—were earnings acquired during marriage and thus community property. The court found the husband's testimony regarding his intent credible, which is sufficient to overcome the form of the title.
Analysis:
This case affirms the principle in community property jurisdictions that the form of title is not conclusive in determining the character of an asset. It underscores the power of parol evidence, specifically a spouse's testimony about their intent, to overcome a statutory presumption and the form of a written instrument. The decision reinforces the high degree of deference appellate courts grant to trial courts' factual findings, making it difficult to overturn a property characterization on appeal so long as there is some substantial evidence to support the lower court's conclusion. This solidifies that a spouse's self-serving testimony about intent can, on its own, be sufficient to establish the community character of an asset.
Unlock the full brief for Estate of Baer