Estate of Anderson v. Commissioner
8 T.C. 706, 1947 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 242 (1947)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A transfer of property for less than its full market value is not subject to gift tax if it is made in the ordinary course of business, which is defined as a transaction that is bona fide, at arm's length, and free from donative intent.
Facts:
- Anderson and Clayton were the principal owners of a large and complex cotton merchandising business whose success was highly dependent on skilled management.
- To retain key personnel and ensure continuous management, the company established a plan allowing junior executives to purchase common stock.
- The plan was designed to tie ownership to active participation and responsibility within the business enterprise.
- All common stock was subject to a restrictive agreement that set the transfer price based on a formula related to the company's net worth and limited who could own the stock.
- Anderson and Clayton sold common stock to six junior executives pursuant to this pre-existing plan.
- The sales were motivated by a business purpose: to preserve the value of their own large investments by incentivizing the management team responsible for the company's continued success.
Procedural Posture:
- The Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined a gift tax deficiency against the petitioners, Anderson and Clayton.
- The petitioners challenged the Commissioner's determination by filing a petition with the United States Tax Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a sale of stock to key employees for less than its fair market value, when made as part of a bona fide, arm's length business transaction intended to secure management services, constitute a taxable gift under the Revenue Act of 1932?
Opinions:
Majority - Arundell, Judge
No. A sale of stock to key employees for less than its fair market value is not a taxable gift when it qualifies as a transaction made in the ordinary course of business. While Commissioner v. Wemyss established that donative intent is not required to find a taxable gift, it also affirmed the Treasury Regulation's exception for genuine business transactions. The court reasoned that the pertinent inquiry is whether the transaction is a genuine business deal, as distinguished from a family or marital-type transfer. Here, the stock sales were motivated by the business necessity of securing and retaining expert management to protect the value of the founders' own investments. These transactions, part of a long-standing profit-sharing arrangement common in the industry, were bona fide, at arm's length, and free from donative intent. Therefore, they fall within the 'ordinary course of business' exception and are not subject to gift tax, even if the consideration was less than the stock's full market value.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the 'ordinary course of business' exception to the gift tax, clarifying that a transaction's motivation is critical. It establishes that a transfer made for legitimate business reasons, such as incentivizing employees or ensuring management succession, is not a gift, even with inadequate consideration. This precedent protects common corporate practices, like employee stock purchase plans and equity compensation, from being inadvertently classified as taxable gifts. The ruling prevents the IRS from applying the gift tax to transactions where the primary purpose is commercial rather than gratuitous, thereby avoiding interference with normal business conduct.
Unlock the full brief for Estate of Anderson v. Commissioner