Erkins v. Case Power & Equipment Co.
No reporter information provided (1995)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14(a) and New Jersey's Joint Tortfeasors Contribution Act, a defendant sued under a strict products liability theory may implead a third-party defendant to seek contribution based on a negligence theory, as long as both parties' alleged wrongful acts contributed to the same single injury.
Facts:
- The Tenacre Foundation hired T.A. Fitzpatrick Associates, Inc. ('Fitzpatrick') to remove underground fuel tanks from its property.
- Fitzpatrick subcontracted some of the work to ECRACOM, Inc. ('ECRACOM').
- ECRACOM then subcontracted a portion of its work to Thomas J. O’Beirne & Company, the employer of the plaintiff's decedent.
- On May 1, 1992, the decedent was riding in the bucket of a backhoe manufactured by Case Corporation ('Case') at the construction site.
- The decedent fell out of the bucket and was run over by the backhoe, suffering fatal injuries.
- The plaintiff alleges that Case is strictly liable for failing to provide adequate warnings about the dangers of riding in the backhoe's bucket.
- Case alleges that Fitzpatrick and ECRACOM were negligent for failing to conduct safety meetings at the construction site.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiff, representing the decedent's estate, filed a strict products liability action against Case Corporation ('Case') in federal court.
- Plaintiff did not name T.A. Fitzpatrick Associates or ECRACOM, Inc. as defendants.
- Defendant Case Corporation filed a motion for leave to file a third-party complaint against T.A. Fitzpatrick Associates and ECRACOM, Inc., seeking contribution.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does New Jersey law, applied under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14(a), permit a defendant in a strict products liability action to implead and seek contribution from a third-party based on a negligence theory for the same underlying injury?
Opinions:
Majority - Magistrate Judge Pisano
Yes. A defendant in a strict products liability action may implead a third-party defendant based on a negligence theory to seek contribution for the same injury. The court found that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14(a) allows a defendant to implead a third party who may be derivatively liable to the defendant. The substantive right to contribution is governed by the New Jersey Joint Tortfeasors Contribution Act, which defines joint tortfeasors as two or more persons liable in tort for the 'same injury.' The court held that the statute does not require the tortfeasors to be liable under the same legal theory; their independent wrongful acts need only unite to cause a single injury. Therefore, Case's strict liability for failure to warn and Fitzpatrick and ECRACOM's alleged negligence in failing to conduct safety meetings can both be considered contributing causes to the decedent's death, making them joint tortfeasors. Allowing impleader serves the policy goals of Rule 14 (avoiding multiple lawsuits) and the New Jersey Act (preventing a plaintiff from unilaterally selecting which of several at-fault parties will bear the entire burden).
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the intersection of federal procedural rules for impleader and state substantive law on contribution. It establishes that in a diversity action, different theories of liability (e.g., strict liability vs. negligence) are not a bar to a contribution claim between joint tortfeasors under New Jersey law. This reinforces the principles of comparative fault, allowing liability for a single injury to be apportioned among all responsible parties in one proceeding. The ruling discourages plaintiffs from strategically isolating a single, often deep-pocketed, defendant when other parties' negligence may have also contributed to the harm, thereby promoting judicial economy and fairer outcomes.
Unlock the full brief for Erkins v. Case Power & Equipment Co.