Elvis Presley Int'l Memorial Foundation v. Crowell

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville
733 S.W.2d 89 (1987)
ELI5:

Sections

Rule of Law:

Locked

The Legal Principle

This section distills the key legal rule established or applied by the court—the one-liner you'll want to remember for exams.

Facts:

  • Elvis Presley was an internationally famous entertainer who, during his lifetime, capitalized on his fame by entering into agreements to license his name and likeness for use on various merchandise.
  • Elvis Presley died on August 16, 1977, but the commercial demand for products bearing his name and likeness continued, generating substantial revenue for his estate.
  • In October 1980, a group of fans sought to form a not-for-profit corporation called 'The Elvis Presley International Memorial Foundation' (International Foundation).
  • In December 1980, after the Secretary of State initially denied the charter, the Presley estate offered the group a conditional, royalty-free license to use Elvis's name, which the group declined.
  • On February 24, 1981, the Presley estate incorporated Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. (EPE) to manage Presley's commercial rights.
  • On February 26, 1981, the Secretary of State reversed its initial decision and granted a corporate charter to the International Foundation.
  • In May 1985, EPE incorporated its own not-for-profit corporation, 'The Elvis Presley Memorial Foundation, Inc.' (Foundation), to raise funds for a fountain near Presley's home.
  • The relationship between the International Foundation and the Presley estate deteriorated after the formation of the estate's own foundation.

Procedural Posture:

Locked

How It Got Here

Understand the case's journey through the courts—who sued whom, what happened at trial, and why it ended up on appeal.

Issue:

Locked

Legal Question at Stake

This section breaks down the central legal question the court had to answer, written in plain language so you can quickly grasp what's being decided.

Opinions:

Locked

Majority, Concurrences & Dissents

Read clear summaries of each judge's reasoning—the majority holding, any concurrences, and dissenting views—so you understand all perspectives.

Analysis:

Locked

Why This Case Matters

Get the bigger picture—how this case fits into the legal landscape, its lasting impact, and the key takeaways for your class discussion.

Ready to ace your next class?

7 days free, cancel anytime

G

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Elvis Presley Int'l Memorial Foundation v. Crowell (1987)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"