Ellithorp v. Ellithorp
509 So. 2d 178 (1987)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The deposit of a spouse's separate property, such as personal injury settlement proceeds, into a community property bank account does not automatically convert those funds into community property through commingling, provided the separate funds are identifiable and traceable to their source.
Facts:
- Kevin Ellithorp and Lisa Ellithorp were married when Kevin was injured in a vehicular collision on December 29, 1981.
- On February 13, 1984, Kevin settled his personal injury lawsuit, with $358,000 of the total allocated to him for his pain and suffering and loss of income.
- On April 4, 1984, after deducting fees, Kevin received a net settlement check for $248,057.24.
- Kevin deposited the entire net settlement check into a pre-existing community checking account which had a balance of less than $500.
- Within a week of the deposit, Kevin used the majority of the funds to purchase large assets, including single premium annuities, a life insurance policy, and a certificate of deposit.
- In June 1984, Kevin cashed in some of the annuities to make a $28,935 down payment on a residence for the couple.
- Lisa filed for a legal separation on August 17, 1984, which terminated the community property regime.
- Throughout this period, both spouses used the checking account for small community expenses like groceries and utilities, but these were minimal compared to the large asset purchases.
Procedural Posture:
- Kevin E. Ellithorp filed a suit in the district court (trial court) against his former wife, Lisa S. Ellithorp, to partition the assets of their former community property regime.
- The district court ruled in favor of Kevin, classifying the majority of the personal injury settlement proceeds and the assets purchased therewith as his separate property.
- Lisa S. Ellithorp, as appellant, devolutively appealed the district court's judgment to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit, with Kevin E. Ellithorp as appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does depositing a spouse's separate personal injury settlement proceeds into a community bank account automatically convert the funds into community property when the separate portion is identifiable and traceable?
Opinions:
Majority - John S. Covington, Judge
No. Depositing separate funds into a community account does not automatically convert them to community property if the funds remain traceable. Under Louisiana Civil Code art. 2344, damages for personal injuries are the separate property of the injured spouse. This includes damages for pain and suffering as well as compensation for lost earning capacity attributable to the period after the termination of the community. The court found no manifest error in the trial court's detailed calculations, which successfully 'uncommingled' Kevin's separate funds from the minimal community funds in the account. Because the settlement funds were overwhelmingly larger than the pre-existing community balance and were used almost immediately to purchase specific assets, their separate character was maintained and could be traced directly into the new assets.
Analysis:
This case reinforces the principle that the simple act of depositing separate funds into a community account does not, by itself, cause a transmutation of the property's character. The key factor is traceability; if the separate funds can be clearly identified and their path from source to asset can be documented, they will retain their separate nature. This decision provides guidance on how courts should handle commingled funds, emphasizing a detailed, evidence-based tracing analysis over a rigid rule that any mixing of funds destroys their separate character. It protects a spouse's separate property from being inadvertently converted to community property through temporary placement in a joint account for practical purposes.
