Effel v. Rosberg

Tex: Court of Appeals, 5th Dist.
360 SW 3d 626 (2012)

ELI5:

Rule of Law:

Under Texas law, a lease for an indefinite and uncertain duration, such as for the remainder of the lessee's life, creates a tenancy at will which is terminable at any time by either the lessor or the lessee.

Facts:

As part of a settlement agreement between Robert G. Rosberg and Henry & Jack Effel, Rosberg purchased residential property from the Effels.
The settlement agreement, to which Lena Effel was not a party, stated she could occupy the property for the remainder of her natural life.
A separate lease agreement was signed by Rosberg as lessor and by Henry Effel on behalf of Lena Effel as lessee under a power of attorney.
The lease specified the term was 'for a term equal to the remainder of the Lessee’s life, or until such time that she voluntarily vacates the premises.'
The property deed transferred to Rosberg contained no reservation of a life estate for Lena Effel.
Three years later, Rosberg discovered Lena Effel had installed a wrought iron fence on the property.
Rosberg sent Effel a letter terminating her lease, citing the fence as a violation of the lease covenants, and demanding she vacate the property within ten days.
Lena Effel did not vacate the property.

Procedural Posture:

Robert G. Rosberg filed a forcible detainer (eviction) action against Lena Effel in the justice court.
The justice court, a court of first instance, awarded possession of the property to Rosberg.
Lena Effel, as appellant, appealed the decision to the county court at law.
The county court held a trial de novo and again awarded possession to Rosberg, the appellee, concluding the lease created a tenancy at will.
Lena Effel, as appellant, appealed the county court's judgment to the Court of Appeals.

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a lease agreement for a term equal to the remainder of the lessee's life, or until she voluntarily vacates, create a tenancy at will that is terminable at any time by the lessor under Texas law?

Opinions:

Majority - Justice Morris

Yes, a lease for an uncertain term, such as for the lessee's lifetime, creates a tenancy at will terminable by either party. The long-standing rule in Texas is that a lease must be for a certain period of time, otherwise it is considered a tenancy at will. Courts have consistently held that the uncertainty of the date of a lessee's death renders a lifetime lease terminable at will. Furthermore, because the lease explicitly allowed Lena Effel to terminate it at her will by voluntarily vacating, the law grants the lessor, Rosberg, the same reciprocal right to terminate at his will. Therefore, Rosberg was entitled to terminate the tenancy at any time, regardless of whether Effel had actually defaulted on any lease covenants. The reason provided in the notice to vacate was irrelevant to the legal sufficiency of the termination.

Analysis:

This decision reaffirms the traditional, strict common law rule in Texas that requires certainty in the duration of a lease term. It solidifies the precedent that a lease for a person's lifetime is considered an indefinite term, thus creating a tenancy at will rather than a secure life estate. This case serves as a critical reminder for legal practitioners that to create an enforceable long-term tenancy, a definite term must be specified. The court's refusal to consider the parties' intent from the preceding settlement agreement highlights the importance of the final, controlling legal document—the lease—in determining the nature of the tenancy relationship.

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Effel v. Rosberg (2012)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"