Edgewood Independent School District v. Kirby
777 S.W.2d 391 (1989)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A public school financing system that relies heavily on local property taxes and creates substantial disparities in revenue and educational opportunities between property-wealthy and property-poor districts is not 'efficient' and thus violates the state constitutional mandate to provide for a general diffusion of knowledge.
Facts:
- The Texas public school system is funded by a combination of state funds (approximately 42%) and local ad valorem property taxes (approximately 50%).
- Taxable property wealth varies dramatically among school districts, with the wealthiest district having over $14,000,000 in property wealth per student and the poorest having approximately $20,000, a 700-to-1 ratio.
- This wealth disparity leads to vast differences in per-student spending, ranging from $2,112 to $19,333 annually.
- Property-poor districts must levy significantly higher tax rates to generate minimal funding, while property-rich districts can tax at low rates and still spend far above the state average.
- For example, the 100 poorest districts had an average tax rate of 74.5 cents per $100 valuation and spent an average of $2,978 per student, while the 100 wealthiest districts taxed at an average of 47 cents and spent $7,233 per student.
- The state's Foundation School Program, intended to supplement poorer districts, is underfunded and does not cover costs for facilities or debt service, forcing almost all districts to rely on additional local funds.
- These funding disparities result in dramatic differences in educational quality, with poor districts often lacking basic courses like chemistry and foreign languages, extracurricular activities, and experienced teachers, while wealthy districts offer extensive programs and resources.
Procedural Posture:
- Edgewood Independent School District, 67 other school districts, and numerous parents and students filed suit in a Texas trial court seeking a declaration that the state's school financing system was unconstitutional.
- The trial court found the system unconstitutional, ruling that it violated the Texas Constitution.
- The State appealed to the Texas Court of Appeals, an intermediate appellate court.
- The Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, reversed the trial court's judgment and declared the financing system constitutional.
- Edgewood ISD and the other plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court of Texas, the state's highest court for civil matters.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the Texas public school financing system, which results in significant disparities in funding and educational opportunities between property-wealthy and property-poor districts, violate the 'efficiency' clause of the Texas Constitution, Article VII, Section 1?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Mauzy
Yes. The Texas public school financing system violates the state constitution's mandate for an 'efficient' system of public free schools. The court interprets 'efficient' to mean a system that is effective in achieving its purpose: a 'general diffusion of knowledge' available to all students. The current system, with its gross funding disparities based on local property wealth, is the antithesis of efficiency because it denies students in poor districts a substantially equal opportunity to access educational funds. The court reasoned that the framers of the Texas Constitution never contemplated such inequalities and intended for the tax burden and educational resources to be distributed more equitably. The court held there must be 'a direct and close correlation between a district’s tax effort and the educational resources available to it,' meaning districts must have 'substantially equal access to similar revenues per pupil at similar levels of tax effort.' The system must be changed at a fundamental level, as the legislature's obligation to provide an efficient system is a primary, constitutionally-imposed duty.
Analysis:
This landmark decision established that a state's constitutional mandate for an 'efficient' education system is judicially enforceable and includes a substantive requirement of funding equity. The ruling shifted the focus from mere state appropriations to the equity and outcome of the entire financing structure. This precedent triggered decades of legislative reform in Texas, known as the 'Robin Hood' plans, and influenced school finance litigation nationwide by affirming that educational funding disparities are not merely a political question but a constitutional one. It solidified the role of state courts in compelling legislative action to correct inequitable school funding systems.
Unlock the full brief for Edgewood Independent School District v. Kirby