Eads v. Brazelton
22 Ark. 499 (1861) (1861)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
To acquire a legal right to abandoned property by occupancy, a finder must gain actual physical possession of the property with the intent to possess it. Merely discovering the property and marking its location with an intent to retrieve it in the future is insufficient to establish possession.
Facts:
- In November 1827, the steamboat America sank in the Mississippi River with a cargo of lead, which was subsequently abandoned by its owners.
- The wreck remained concealed for years under a newly formed island, which later washed away.
- In December 1854, Brazelton located the precise position of the wreck with the intention of salvaging its lead cargo.
- In January 1855, Brazelton marked the location by putting marks on trees on the riverbank and placing a buoy attached to a weight directly over the wreck.
- Brazelton was delayed in beginning his salvage operations for several months due to other business, high water levels, and the need to repair his boat and equipment.
- On September 28, 1855, Eads & Nelson, a professional wrecking company, arrived with their salvage boat, located the wreck, positioned their boat over it, and began actively raising the lead.
Procedural Posture:
- Brazelton filed a bill in equity in the Circuit Court of Mississippi County against Eads & Nelson.
- The trial court granted Brazelton a preliminary injunction, ordering Eads & Nelson to cease their salvage operations.
- The trial court later held two of the defendants in contempt for obstructing Brazelton's work in violation of the injunction, fining them $1,000, which was paid to Brazelton as damages.
- Following a trial, the Circuit Court entered a final decree in favor of Brazelton, making the injunction permanent and awarding him damages equal to the value of the lead recovered by the defendants.
- The defendants, Eads & Nelson, appealed the Circuit Court's decree to the Arkansas Supreme Court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does marking the location of an abandoned shipwreck with buoys and shoreline reference points, with the intent to return and salvage it, constitute sufficient possession to establish a right of occupancy and exclude others from salvaging the wreck?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Justice Fairchild
No. Marking the location of an abandoned shipwreck without taking actual physical control does not constitute possession. Acquiring title to abandoned property by occupancy requires both the intent to possess (animus) and corporeal possession of the thing (corpus). Brazelton demonstrated intent to possess the wreck, but his actions of marking trees and placing a buoy were merely indications of his intent, not acts of actual possession. He never took physical control or detention of the property. In contrast, Eads & Nelson achieved possession when they placed their boat over the wreck and commenced salvage operations. The court reasoned that possession must be an outward act signifying dominion and control, such as keeping an effectual guard over the property that warns off intruders. Citing principles from common law, civil law, and admiralty, the court compared the situation to hunting wild animals, where mere pursuit or discovery does not grant ownership; one must achieve capture or control.
Analysis:
This case establishes a foundational principle in property law regarding the acquisition of abandoned goods (res nullius). It clarifies that the rule of 'first finder' requires more than mere discovery; it mandates an affirmative act of appropriation and control. The decision sets a clear standard that favors diligent and capable actors who can immediately exert physical dominion over the property, rather than those who simply discover it and intend to act later. This precedent has significant implications for salvage law and disputes over found property, emphasizing that rights are vested through actual possession, thereby discouraging speculative claims based on discovery alone.
Unlock the full brief for Eads v. Brazelton