Doyal v. Oklahoma Heart, Inc.
10 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 991, 213 F. 3d 492, 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2795 (2000)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
To establish a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), an individual must demonstrate that their physical or mental impairment substantially limits a major life activity, meaning they are significantly restricted in condition, manner, or duration compared to the average person in the general population.
Facts:
- Carol Doyal began working as an administrator for Oklahoma Heart, Inc. in April 1992.
- In early 1995, Oklahoma Heart implemented a new billing and accounting system, which created a stressful work environment for employees, including Doyal.
- During this period, Doyal began experiencing symptoms of anxiety, stress, insomnia, panic attacks, and difficulty concentrating.
- In March 1995, Doyal had a 'mental breakdown' at work, after which she took a week off.
- During her week off, a psychiatrist diagnosed Doyal with 'Major Depression, moderate, with anxiety attacks' and prescribed medication.
- Upon returning to work, Doyal transferred to a less stressful position as human resources director but continued to experience memory problems, such as forgetting the names of job candidates.
- In late April 1995, Doyal was briefly hospitalized for a stress-related illness.
- On May 16, 1995, Oklahoma Heart terminated Doyal’s employment, citing her memory lapses, poor judgment, and inability to make decisions.
Procedural Posture:
- Carol Doyal sued her former employer, Oklahoma Heart, Inc., in a federal trial court.
- Doyal's complaint alleged employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
- Oklahoma Heart filed a motion for summary judgment, asking the court to dismiss the case.
- The trial court granted Oklahoma Heart's motion for summary judgment in its favor.
- Doyal, as the appellant, appealed the trial court's order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an employee's depression constitute a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) when its symptoms, such as forgetfulness and sleep disruption, are not shown to be severe, long-term, or significantly more restrictive than the abilities of an average person?
Opinions:
Majority - Alarcón, Circuit Judge
No, an employee's depression does not constitute a disability under the ADA when its symptoms are not shown to be significantly more restrictive than the abilities of an average person. To qualify as disabled, a plaintiff must do more than show they have an impairment; they must provide evidence that the impairment substantially limits a major life activity. Doyal failed to meet this burden. Her forgetfulness was described as a 'common human frailty' and she did not show her difficulty learning the new computer system was greater than that of her colleagues. While she had insomnia, it was mitigated by medication and at times she slept for excessively long periods, which precludes an inference of a severe, ongoing limitation. Her difficulties with thinking and interacting with others were not supported by sufficient evidence to show a significant restriction compared to the general population. Furthermore, Oklahoma Heart did not 'regard' her as disabled; it perceived her as unmotivated and performing poorly, not as an individual with an impairment that substantially limited a major life activity.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the high evidentiary bar for plaintiffs claiming disability under the ADA, particularly for mental health conditions with symptoms common to the general population. The court's ruling establishes that a medical diagnosis alone is insufficient; a plaintiff must present specific, individualized evidence that their functional limitations are significantly more severe and long-lasting than those of an average person. By classifying forgetfulness and temporary sleep issues as non-disabling without more evidence, the case narrows the path for ADA claims based on moderate depression or anxiety. This precedent requires future courts to conduct a rigorous comparative analysis, considering mitigating measures, and distinguishes between an employer's perception of poor performance and its perception of a legally recognized disability.
