Doucet v. Alleman
2015 La. App. LEXIS 1962, 15 La.App. 3 Cir. 246, 175 So.3d 1094 (2015)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A business hosting a promotional event on public roads does not have a legal duty to protect participants from harm caused by a third-party's unforeseeable, negligent act of becoming so distracted by the event itself that they cause a collision.
Facts:
- In March 2010, Cajun Harley Davidson hosted a promotional group motorcycle ride on public roads in Louisiana.
- Ralph John Doucet was a participant in this group ride.
- Keith Alleman, driving his own vehicle in the opposite direction, was a self-described motorcycle enthusiast.
- Alleman saw the group of motorcycles, became distracted by their presence, and veered off the road.
- Alleman then overcorrected his steering, swerved across the road, and crashed into Doucet.
- Doucet was killed in the collision.
- Alleman later testified that his distraction was caused by his general interest in motorcycles and that any group of motorcycles would have similarly distracted him.
Procedural Posture:
- The widow and son of Ralph John Doucet sued Cajun Cycles, Inc. (d/b/a Cajun Harley Davidson) in a Louisiana state trial court for negligence.
- Cajun Harley filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding its liability.
- The trial court granted Cajun Harley's motion for summary judgment.
- The plaintiffs (appellants) appealed the trial court's decision to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a motorcycle dealership hosting a promotional ride on public roads have a legal duty to protect a participant from a third-party driver who, being a motorcycle enthusiast, becomes so distracted by the sight of the motorcycles that he loses control of his vehicle and causes a fatal collision?
Opinions:
Majority - Gremillion, J.
No. A motorcycle dealership's duty to host a reasonably safe event does not extend to the unforeseeable risk that a third-party driver, who is also a motorcycle enthusiast, would become so distracted by the mere sight of the group as to cause a fatal accident. The court reasoned that Keith Alleman's actions were the sole legal cause of the accident, not any failure by Cajun Harley. Alleman himself testified that his distraction was due to his general interest in motorcycles, which means that no additional safety measures plaintiffs proposed—such as safety vests, a police escort, or a different route—would have prevented his distraction. Therefore, the specific harm was not a foreseeable consequence of Cajun Harley's conduct, and extending the dealership's duty to cover this scenario would be an unreasonable imposition of liability based on policy grounds.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the critical distinction between cause-in-fact and legal cause within negligence law. While Cajun Harley's event was a "but-for" cause of the accident (it would not have happened if the ride wasn't taking place), the court found it was not the legal cause. The ruling limits the scope of an event organizer's duty, clarifying that they are not insurers against all possible harm, particularly harm arising from the unforeseeable and highly negligent actions of third parties. This precedent protects businesses from potentially limitless liability for bizarre chains of events that they could not reasonably anticipate or prevent.
